Amrinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44625-2024 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 28.08.2025 -1AMRINDER SINGH .....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL
 Mr. Amandeep Singh Jawandha, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate for respondent No.2. H.S. Grewal, J. (Oral)
  he present petition has been filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 06.05.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in case FIR No.53 dated 14.07.2023 under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Section 82 of Registration Act, 1908 registered at Police Station Daba, District Ludhiana.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he is seeking cancellation of bail of respondent No.2 on the ground that he had impersonated as actual owner of the property while executing the sale deed registered. It is stated that the same allegations were also mentioned in the FIR registered against him and were duly considered by the Court while granting him the Sonia Puri 2025.09.01 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

concession of anticipatory bail. He further contends that no condition so -2imposed while granting bail to respondent No.2, has been violated by him. 3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.2 also contends that respondent No.2 never misused the concession of bail granted to him nor violated any such condition.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the paper book.

5.

Since the order of cancellation of bail is something that affects the personal liberty of a person, which is guaranteed under 


of the Constitution of India. The pleas taken by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking cancellation of bail has already been taken into consideration by the Coordinate Bench of this Court while grating the concession of anticipatory bail to respondent No.2. Moreover, there is no violation of condition so imposed while granting him anticipatory bail, as such, no ground is made out to cancel the bail so granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 06.05.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.

6.

Given above, the present petition is hereby, dismissed.  28th August, 2025 (H.S. GREWAL) Sonia Puri JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.09.01 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document