← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/45044/2024disposed of

Raj Kumari v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-09-12Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

CRM-M No. 45044 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 45044 of 2024 Date of Decision: 12.09.2024 Raj Kumari ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 21.06.2024 City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur 307, 34 IPC and 25, 27 of Arms Act (Section 302 IPC added later on) 1.

The mother of the deceased- son who was murdered has come up before this Court under SecƟon 528 BNSS seeking transfer of invesƟgaƟon because she is not saƟsfied with the invesƟgaƟon conducted by respondent No.5. 2.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

3.

State counsel submits that the peƟƟoner has nothing to fear and they would ensure that jusƟce is done to deceased as well to the peƟƟoner. 4.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that her fundamental worry is that the InvesƟgator might not file challan within the statutory limitaƟon which will enƟtle the accused to default bail.

5.

Given above, the present peƟƟon is disposed of with the following observaƟons. Firstly, challan be filed within the statutory limitaƟon and copy of challan Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.17 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 45044 of 2024 be supplied to her so that she can go through the quality of evidence and secondly, liberty is given to come to this Court again. 6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is disposed of with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.17 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh