High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/43797/2019disposed of

Anup Singh And Another v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2019-10-17Mr. Justice Hari Pal Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-43797 of 2019 Date of Decision: 17.10.2019 ANUP SINGH AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONER(S)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA Present:- Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

***** HARI PAL VERMA, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.120 dated 18.09.2019 under Section 376-D, 506, 120B IPC and Section 25 Arms Act, registered at Women Police Station Narnaul, District Mohindergarh.

Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. In fact, petitioner no.2-Sharmila, who is wife of petitioner no.1-Anup Singh, is the complainant in two FIRs registered against the husband of respondent no.5-Suman Devi and it is for this reason, the present FIR has been registered against them. In order to highlight their false implication in the case, the petitioners have submitted a representation dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P-2) to respondent no.3Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh. Though the petitioners have not ASHWANI KUMAR 2019.10.17 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-43797 of 2019 -2been arrested, but still an uncertainty is prevailing in their minds because of the pendency of the FIR.

Notice of motion.

At this stage, Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice.

Without observing anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to have a fair investigation in the case and to consider the representation dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply five sets of this petition to learned State counsel during the course of the day. October 17, 2019 ( HARI PAL VERMA ) AK JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No ASHWANI KUMAR 2019.10.17 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document