Ankit Kumar And ANR v. Haryana State Technical Education Society And ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-903-2017 Date of Decision: September 28, 2017 Ankit Kumar and another .....Appellants

Versus

Haryana State Technical Educational Society and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Animesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.K.Chugh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr.Bhuwan Vats, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Anurag Singh Tagra and Ms.Sai Geeta, Advocates for respondent No.3 ........

SURYA KANT, J.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy in this appeal stands answered in favour of the appellants vide our order dated August 31, 2017 passed in CWP No.851 of 2017 (B.S.Anangpuria Charitable Trust and another vs Pt.B.D.Sharma, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak) and connected case.

For the reasons assigned in the cited order, the appeal is allowed; the order passed by the learned Single Judge is set aside and the admission granted to the appellants is ordered to be regularised. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE September 28, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.09.29 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh