Anil Sheikhar v. State Bank Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 318 of 2018 (O&M) Decided on : 07.05.2018 Anil Sheikhar . . . Appellant

Versus

State Bank of India and others . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for the appellant. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The challenge in this Letters Patent Appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is to the common order dated 27th January, 2016, passed in CWP No. 16457 of 2011, titled as, "Anil Sheikhar Vs. State Bank of India and others", whereby, the services of the appellant as Customer Relationship Executive terminated by the respondent Bank has been upheld while dismissing the said batch of writ petitions on the ground that he failed to achieve minimum 60% targets. Further, the impugned judgment has been set aside by this Court in LPA No. 739 of 2016, decided on 12.01.2018 in CWP No. 17374 of 2011 and the case has been remanded back to the Single Judge for consideration and arguments. 2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA), as the same has been filed belatedly. However, it was prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant to approach the authorities concerned, in case they pass any favourable order in the other similar cases, which were remanded by the Coordinate Bench of this Court. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the appellant to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE May 07, 2018 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2018.05.08 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh