Anita Sharma v. State Of Haryana And Another

CWP No.28801 of 2019 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.28801 of 2019 Date of decision:03.10.2019 Dr. Anita Sharma ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr. Rajan S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to consider and grant the Child Care Leave to the petitioner in terms of Rule-46 of Haryana Civil Services (Leave) Rules 2016 (Annexure P-3).

Notice of motion.

On asking of Court, Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents/State.

Mr.Aman Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that though petitioner has not submitted any representation but her writ petition may be treated as representation. SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.28801 of 2019 {2} In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation in view of orders, Annexure P-9 (colly) by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of one month owing to ill health of child from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, representation is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioner.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 03, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh