High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28690/2019disposed of

Mahinder Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2019-10-03Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28690-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28690-2019 Date of decision : 03.10.2019 Mahinder Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 19.09.2019 (Annexure P-6), whereby petitioner has been transferred from CHC Sorkhi to CHC Khanda Kheri, just to harass and humiliate the petitioner without any reason and further writ of mandamus directing respondent No.5 to disclose the EPF and ESI Number of petitioner and released the amount of monthly EPF and ESI in his favour, which respondent No.5 has been withheld as well as further prayer for directing respondent No.5 to release the amount of monthly EPF and ESI in his favour with interest @ 18% from the date of appointment of petitioner till date. This Court is not inclined to interfere in the prayer of transfer of petitioner.

As regards the amount of EPF and ESI, learned counsel for the

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28690-2019 petitioner submits that petitioner is permitted to make a representation and a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider the same within a stipulated period.

Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to make a representation and direct respondent No.2 to consider the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioner.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 03.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No