Gram Panchayat Bhuna v. Union Of India And ORS

CWP-28866-2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CWP-28866-2019 DATE OF DECISION:- 08.08.2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT BHUNA ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Raman Deep, Advocate with Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sudhir Nar, Advocate, for respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Aman Bahri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. M.S.Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8.

Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.9.

...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

By way of instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has approached this Court inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 13.06.2019, Annexure P-15, passed by respondent No.2, whereby, representation dated 05.08.2018, Annexure P-4, moved by the petitioner, had been rejected.

PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.08.08 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CWP-28866-2019 -22.

On 26.05.2023, this Court passed the following order:- "Costs deposited.

Learned counsel for respondent No.9 submits that matter has been reconciled.

Learned counsel for the parties seek time to have instructions.

List on 21st August, 2023."

3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have any instructions. However, counsel representing respondent No.9, submits that the matter has been settled.

4.

In view of above, writ petition is disposed of. 5.

In case, statement of the counsel for respondent No.9, is found to be incorrect, liberty is granted to the petitioner to seek revival of the petition. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 08.08.2024 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.08.08 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.