← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRSA/1693/2015disposed of

Shamsher Singh & ANR v. Nirmal Singh & ORS

2026-02-24Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan2 pages

RSA-750-2014 (O&M) RSA-1693-2015 (O&M)  Sr. No.257

(02) (03)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 24th February 2026 (I) RSA-750-2014 (O&M) BALWINDER SINGH ........Appellant versus NIRMAL SINGH AND OTHERS ........Respondents (II) RSA-1693-2015 (O&M) SHAMSHER SINGH AND ANOTHER ........Appellants versus NIRMAL SINGH AND OTHERS ........Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Present:

Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate for the appellant (in RSA-750-2014).

Mr. Arishdeep Mraad, Advocate for Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate for the appellants (in RSA-1693-2015).

Mr. Varun Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1 (through video conferencing). HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in both the instant Regular Second Appeals is for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 05.10.2009, passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Malerkotla, whereby, the suit of the respondents was decreed, and for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2013, passed by the Additional District Judge, Sangrur. 2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the recovery was sought on account of some dispute in the personal relations of the parties. SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2026.02.27 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RSA-750-2014 (O&M) RSA-1693-2015 (O&M)  3.

Learned counsel for the appellant-Balwinder Singh submits that the decreetal amount has been deposited in the Executing Court. The decree holder did not press the execution petitions, as such, the execution petition filed by the decree holder has been dismissed in default. The appellant has no objection if the decreetal amount deposited in the Executing Court is released to the decree holder. So at this stage, he wishes to withdraw the present appeals. However, the appellant may be given liberty to file an application for revival of the present appeals, in case the decree holder files a subsequent execution petition seeking the recovery of interest part. 4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1-Nirmal Singh submits that he has no objection if the present Regular Second Appeals are disposed of in terms of the statement given by the learned counsel for the appellant. 5.

In view of the above, both the present Regular Second Appeals are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, in terms of the statement of parties.

6.

However, liberty is given to the appellants to file an application for revival of the present appeals in case the decree holder files a subsequent execution petition before the Executing Court. 7.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. 8.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE 24th February 2026 simran Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2026.02.27 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document