Manish Kumar Pandey v. Bank Of Maharashtra

YANA AT CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH C

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARY CWP-23087-202 MANISH KUM BANK OF MAH CORAM: HON HON

Present:

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

ANUPINDER S DATE OF DEC ISION: 11.09.2024 MAR PANDEY AND ANOTHE ER ... Petitioner (s)

Versus

HARASHTRA AND ANOTHE ER ... Respondent(s) ) N'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPI N'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA INDER SINGH GREWAL A BANERJI Deepam Raghav, Advocate for t the petitioners.

Gaurav Goel, Advocate (through Tarlok Singh, Advocate for resp h VC) and pondents/Bank.

SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Lear rned counsel for the responde ents/Bank submits that as the e property has been n sold, this petition has been rend dered infructuous.

The petition stands disposed of as in nfructuous.

The petitioner would be at liberty to o seek recourse to the alternative e remedy available e under the law.

(ANUPIN NDER SINGH GREWAL) 11.09.2024 SwarnjitS Wheth Wheth JUDGE (LA APITA BANERJI) JUDGE No No her speaking/reasoned :

Yes / her reportable :

Yes / SWARNJIT SINGH 2024.09.11 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document