← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/2209/2024disposed of

Inderjit Singh v. Union Of India And ORS

2025-09-15Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,Mr. Justice Vikas Suri4 pages

LPA-968-2022 Darshan Singh and others .... Appellant

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents LPA-969-2022 Kuldip Singh (deceased) Through L.Rs.and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents LPA-970-2022 Gurbaj Singh and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents LPA-971-2022 Hazoor Singh and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents LPA-972-2022 Rachhpal Singh and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents

LPA-973-2022 Bhupinder Singh and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents LPA-974-2022 Satwant Kaur and others .... Appellants

Versus

Union of India and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: - Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vibhor Bansal, Sr. Panel Counsel and Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.1-Union of India.

Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2 (in LPA No.2209 & 2211 of 2024).

Mr. R. S. Madaan, Advocate with Mr. Mahender Joshi, Advocate for respondent NHAI.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeals may be disposed of as having been not pressed with liberty to take an appropriate remedy

under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the arbitral award, in case available.

2.

Ordered accordingly.

3.

A photocopy of this order shall be placed on files of other connected cases.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE September 15, 2025 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes