Naresh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH LPA-741-2018 (O&M Date of Decision: 11.02.20 CHANDIGA M) NARESH K KUMAR . . . . Appell ant Vs.

HARYANA AND OTHERS STATE OF H . . . . Responde ents **** HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M

CORAM:

NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA **** Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate w Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate Mr. Vijay Vardhan, Advocate for the appellant.

Present

with Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G.

, Haryana.

Mr. Rishi Lal, Advocate for Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.6.

**** PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) SANJEEV P

1. Admit ) ttedly, the appellant is no more working with the respondents.

He was ap ppointed on contract basis. His co ontract period is already over.

2. This C Court in writ jurisdiction or in LPA cannot direct a person to be appoin nted on contract basis.

3. In vie ew thereto, no relief can be giv ven to the appellant. Appeal stan nds dismis ssed accordingly.

4. All pe posed of.

ending applications also stand disp (SA NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA A) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 11.02.2025 Mohit goyal Yes/No Yes/No

1. Wheth

2. Wheth her speaking/reasoned?

her reportable?

MOHIT GOYAL 2025.02.11 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document