Karma Ram (Correct Name Karam Chand ) v. Labh Singh

RSA No.3714 of 2016 (O&M) {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3714 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:20.05.2019 Karma Ram (correct name Karam Chand) ... Appellant Vs.

Labh Singh ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) C.M.No.9733-C of 2016 For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 430 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands allowed.

RSA No.3714 of 2016 (O&M) Short point involved in the present regular second appeal is whether the appellant-defendant being landlord can forcibly take the possession from the respondent-plaintiff who has not been successful in seeking restraint against forcible interference and dispossession, the answer is 'No'.

Since the relationship between the parties was admitted and the injunction granted is so innocuous, the appellant-defendant is at liberty to SAVITA KADIAN 2019.05.21 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

RSA No.3714 of 2016 (O&M) {2} seek the eviction in accordance with law, if any of the grounds substantiated.

Resultantly, the regular second appeal is dismissed. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 20, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.05.21 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh