Jagdish Kumar Bhakri v. Vikas Kumar Bhakri And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-2358-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.04.2025 JAGDISH KUMAR BHAKRI .... Appellant

VERSUS

VIKAS KUMAR BHAKRI AND ANR .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None for the appellant.

Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has pointed out that the dispute in the present case is between father (appellant herein) and son (respondent No.1 herein) and that the father (plaintiff-appellant herein) had filed a suit for declaration and permanent and mandatory injunction for deleting the name of his son (defendant-respondent No.1) from the FDRs. The Trial Court had decreed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 14.01.2014. However, the First Appellate Court had reversed the same vide judgment and decree dated 27.02.2015. Aggrieved by the same, the present regular second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant. Learned counsel has further pointed out that in the interregnum, the plaintiffappellant has since expired and the entire amount had been inherited by his son (defendant-respondent No.1).

AMAN JAIN 2025.04.05 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

RSA-2358-2015 (O&M) -22.

None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant today. 3.

In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present regular second appeal for non-prosecution. 4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

04.04.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.04.05 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment