Jamshed Ahmed v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44349 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2020 Jamshed Ahmed
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in complaint case No.28 dated 05.10.2016 titled "Mohd. Yusuf v. Jamshed Ahmed" under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Tauru, District Nuh, Mewat.
Heard.
Considering seriousness of allegations against the petitioner, he does not deserve any concession of anticipatory bail, more particularly, when investigating officer could not lay hand on the petitioner, despite issuance of non-bailable warrants against him. Dismissed.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) January 13, 2020 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.01.14 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document