← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/47642/2023allowed

Rajesh Ramakrishnan v. State Of Haryana

2023-10-12Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

CRM-M-47642-2023 2023:PHHC:132953

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-47642-2023 Decided on: 12.10.2023 Rajesh Ramakrishnam

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate for the complainant. Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate Mr. Raj Sumer Singh, Advocate and Mr. Imran Ali, Advocate for the victim-Ritu Kochhar.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 06.09.2023 Anti Corruption Bureau Police Station Gurugram, Haryana 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act 1.

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, had come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. 2.

Vide order dated 20.09.2023, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner, which is continuing till date.

3.

Petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner had joined the investigation on 26.09.2023 and voluntarily complied with the previous order dated 20.09.2023. 4.

On instructions from Inspector Suresh Kumar, counsel for the State has not disputed the contention made by counsel for the petitioner, however they want custodial investigation.

5.

Given above, interim order dated 20.09.2023 is made absolute and consequently, the petition is allowed. It is clarified that the petitioner shall join investigation as and ANJU RANI 2023.10.13 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-47642-2023 2023:PHHC:132953 when called upon to do so. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.10.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ANJU RANI 2023.10.13 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document