Hsiidc v. Ashok Kumar And ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Date of Decision: 23.09.2021 Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (Now Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited). ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Ashok Kumar and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Ashwani Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for the HSIIDC.

Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate for the landowners.

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Sanjay Vashisth and Mr. Akash Vasisth, Advocates.

Mr. B.K.Bagri, Advocate.

Mr. J.P.Jangu, Advocate.

Mr. R.D.Yadav and Mr. S.S.Chaudhary, Advocates. Mr. Deepak Kundu, Advocate.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

By this judgment, this Bench shall dispose of a bunch of the regular first appeals/cross-appeals (details whereof are available at the foot

of the judgment) filed against the various judgments passed by the Additional District Judge, Rewari (hereinafter referred to as "the Reference Court") with respect to the acquisition of the land measuring 1016 acres 1 kanal and 3 marlas (8129 kanals 3 marlas) located in the villages Suthani, Jaliawas, Suthana, Karnawas, Chirhara, Asalwas, Banipur, Patuhera and Bawalpur Jaliawas, Asalwas, Suthani, Suthana, Karnawas, Chirhara, Banipur, Bawal and Patuhera by a common notification dated 02.12.2005 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1894 Act"). The facts of the case are being taken from the Regular Second Appeal No. 1436 of 2018 arising from award No. 16/R dated 25.05.2006.

2.

On 02.12.2005, the State of Haryana issued a notification under Section 4 of the he 1894 Act proposing to acquire the land in the aforesaid villages for extension of the Industrial Growth Centre, Bawal, to be structured as Industrial Recreation and Other Public Utility Centre. The Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as "the LAC") announced the various awards village-wise, details whereof are compiled as under: I) Village Suthani - Award No. 8/R dated 17.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 1285 kanals and 2 marlas, acquired as Chahi (1114K-18M), Banjar Qadim (125K4M) and Gairmumkin (45K). II) Village Jaliawas - Award No.9/R dated 17.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 325 kanals and 4 marlas, acquired as Chahi (296K-02M), Barani (17K-12M) and Gairmumkin (11 k).

III) Village Suthana - Award No. 10/R dated 23.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 27 kanals and 13 marlas (Chahi).

IV) Village Karnawas - Award No. 11/R dated 23.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 778 kanals and 13 marlas, acquired as Chahi (437 K), Bhud (128K-02M), Banjar (148K-17M), Mugda (13K-6M) and Gairmumkin (14K-18M).

V) Village Chirhara - Award No. 12/R dated 25.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 112 kanals and 9 marlas, acquired as Chahi (90K-6M), Barani (9K-6M) and Gairmumkin (12K-17M).

VI) Village Asalwas - Award No. 13/R dated 25.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 1562 kanals and 11 marlas, acquired as Chahi (1308K-4M), Barani (226K-8M) and Gairmumkin (27K-19M).

VII) Village Banipur - Award No. 14/R dated 25.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 1543 kanals and 14 marlas, acquired as Chahi (1478K-19M), Barani (17K-02 M) and Gairmumkin (55K-12M).

VIII) Village Patuhera - Award No. 15/R dated 25.05.2006. The total acquisition of the land is 1934 kanals and 13 marlas, acquired as Chahi (1643K-17M), Barani (259K11M) and Gairmumkin ( 31K- 05M). IX) Village Bawalpur - Award No. 16/R dated 25.05.2006.

The total acquisition of the land is 550 kanals and 12 marlas, acquired as Chahi (529K-13M) and Gairmumkin ( 20K- 19M).

2.

FACTS 2.1 The LAC through the aforesaid various awards uniformly assessed the market value of the land @ 12,50,000/- per acre. The owners ₹ were also held entitled to the amended provisions of the 1894 Act including the additional amount and solatium @ 30%. On their applications, the LAC referred the matter to the Court for determination of the market value of the land under Section 18 of the 1894 Act.

2.2 In the first round, on 26.02.2015, the Reference Court assessed the market value of the land @ 16,00,000/- per acre. However, on ₹ 07.04.2007, in the appeals, filed by the owners as well as the beneficiary of the acquisition i.e. Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the HSIIDC"), the cases were remitted back to the Reference Court for a fresh decision. The main judgment is in Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (now Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited) v. Ashok Kumar and Others (Regular First Appeal No. 3619 of 2015). As directed by the High Court, the parties were permitted to lead further evidence and through the various separate judgments, the Reference Court has assessed a uniform market value of the acquired land @ 19,30,491/-.

₹ 2.3 At this stage, it is appropriate to notice that normally, 1 acre of land consists of 4840 square yards area. Each acre consists of 8 kanals of

land. In other words, 1 kanal of land is equivalent to 605 square yards. Each kanal of land consists of 20 marlas. Accordingly, 1 acre of land normally consists of 160 marlas of land. Each marla of land is a little bit more than 30 square yards area. The expression 'Chahi' means the land which has an irrigation facility and can be used for growing 2 crops in a year, whereas expression 'Barani' means the agricultural land which is dependent on rainfall for irrigation. Normally, in the later type of land only one crop can be sown depending upon the weather conditions. On the other hand, the expression 'Banjar' depicts land which is lying barren. The expression 'Gair Mumkin' is used by the revenue officials to describe a land which is used for non agricultural purposes.

2.4 Heard learned counsel representing the parties and with their able assistance, perused the paper book as well as the record of the Reference Court, which was requisitioned.

3.

EVIDENCE 3.1 At this stage, it is important to note that the Reference Court, while deciding all these matters by separate judgments dealing with individual cases, village wise, has awarded a uniform amount, i.e., ₹19,30,491/-. On a careful perusal of the evidence produced by both the parties, it is evident that most of the sale deeds produced in one case have been repeated in the others. Thus, this Bench has taken the liberty to compile the information of all the sale deeds produced by the landowners, while excluding the repetition, in the following table:-

TABLE "A"

S.No.

Date Area Value ( ₹ ) Per Acre ( ₹ ) Village Remarks 01.

16.11.2005 4 M 36,000 14,40,000 Suthani Plot 02.

29.08.2005 4K-15M 7,15,000 12,04,210 Suthani -- 03.

21.06.2001 1 K 1,03,000 8,24,000 Suthani -- 04.

08.06.2005 7 M 2,20,000 50,28,571 Bawal Chahi 05.

08.06.2005 8 M 2,47,000 49,40,000 Bawal -- 06.

13.09.2004 2 M 1,00,000 80,00,000 Bawal -- 07.

06.01.2005 3 M 57,000 30,40,000 Bawal -- 08.

22.09.2004 11 M 1,90,000 27,63,636 Bawal -- 09.

13.06.2005 4 M 1,33,000 53,20,000 Bawal -- 10.

13.06.2005 9 M 2,60,000 46,22,222 Bawal -- 11.

13.06.2005 1 K 6,00,000 48,00,000 Bawal -- 12.

13.06.2005 7 M 2,16,000 49,37,142 Bawal -- 13.

13.06.2005 3 M 2,20,000 1,17,33,333 Bawal Plot 14.

22.09.2004 2 M 1,00,000 80,00,000 Bawal -- 15.

15.06.2005 6 M 1,75,000 46,66,666 Bawal -- 16.

14.06.2005 15 M 3,60,000 38,40,000 Bawal -- 17.

04.05.2005 11 M 1,71,000 24,87,272 Chirahara -- 18.

26.04.2005 1 M 2,80,000 4,48,00,000 Chirahara Plot 19.

04.03.2005 1 M 1,00,000 1,60,00,000 Chirahara -- 20.

10.05.2005 3 M 1,95,000 1,40,00,000 Bawal Residential 21.

16.03.2005 3 M 60,000 32,00,000 Mouja Residential Bawal 22.

28.06.2004 2 M 60,000 48,00,000 Bawal Commercia l 23.

26.08.2004 8 M 4,80,000 96,00,000 Bawal Plot 24.

06.01.2005 5 M 2,76,000 88,32,000 Bawal Residential 25.

23.08.2004 7 M 1,31,000 29,94,285 Bawal -- 26.

02.03.2005 9 M 11,00,000 1,95,55,555 Bawal -- 27.

06.10.2005 18 M 4,44,000 39,46,666 Mouja -- Bawal 28.

19.10.2005 2 K 9,60,000 38,40,000 Bawal Plot 29.

19.10.2005 19 M 4,60,000 38,73,684 Bawal -- 30.

07.10.2005 18 M 4,43,000 39,37,777 Bawal -- 30A. 07.10.2005 18 M 4,44,000 39,46,666 Bwal -- 31.

19.10.2005 12 M 2,77,000 36,93,333 Bawal Plot 32.

02.03.2005 9 M 11,00,000 1,95,55,555 Bawal Sale between

two companies 33.

05.12.2007 4K-3M 5,71,000 11,00,723.00 Karnawas -- 34.

21.11.2007 2 K 3,00,000 12,00,000 Karnawas - 35.

19.12.2001 6 M 40,000 10,66,666 Banipur Plot 36.

07.07.2003 6M-16K 27,70,502 13.85,251 Jaliawas Sale between two Industries 37.

14.06.2005 5M 3,60,000 1,15,20,000 Bawal Residential 38.

10.04.2008 85K16 M 8,55,00,000 79,72,028.00 Deodhai -- 39.

12.12.2007 32K-4M 3,96,36,000 98,47,453.00 Deodhai -- 40.

16.11.2007 58K15 M 9,30,00,000 1,26,63,830.00 Deodhai -- 41.

22.12.2006 1K-2M 5,61,614 40,84,465 Deodhai -- 42.

09.05.2007 18 M 5,45,000 48,44,444 Deodhai -- 3.2 Per contra, the HSIIDC has produced the copies of various sale deeds to prove that the Land Acquisition Collector has correctly assessed the market value and there is no requirement for any further enhancement. The details of the sale deeds, produced by the HSIIDC, are compiled in a tabulated form, which reads as under:

TABLE "B"

S.No.

Date Area Total Amount Per Village Type of Land Amount ( ₹ ) Acre ( ₹ ) 01.

25.04.2005 8 K 4,00,000 4,00,000 Patuhera Agriculture 02.

09.05.2005 4 K 1,75,000 3,50,000 Patuhera Agriculture 03.

24.12.2004 2K-7M 1,60,000 5,44,681 Chirahara Agriculture 04.

17.12.2004 5 M 25,000 8,00,000 Chirahara Gair Mumkin 05.

22.12.2004 7M 40,000 9,14,286 Chirahara Gair Mumkin 06.

20.04.2005 12 M 50,000 6,66,667 Chirahara Agriculture 07.

18.05.2005 3 M 10,000 5,33,333 Chirahara Gair Mumkin 08.

30.05.2005 2 K 65,000 2,60000 Chirahara Agriculture 09.

03.01.2005 9K-13M 12,15,000 10,07,524 Asalwas Agriculture 10.

17.01.2005 1 M 7,000 11,20,000 Asalwas Agriculture

11.

14.03.2005 5K-1M 6,30,000 9,98,020 Asalwas Agriculture 12.

05.04.2005 15K-5M 11,94,000 6,26,361 Asalwas Agriculture 13.

23.05.2005 2 K 2,50,000 10,00,000 Asalwas Agriculture 14.

31.05.2005 8K-1M 10,06,500 10,00,248 Asalwas Agriculture 15.

16.06.2005 4K-1M 3,03.800 6,00,099 Bawal Agriculture 16.

27.06.2005 2 K 1,50,000 6,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 17.

14.03.2005 35 K 30,00,000 6,85,714 Bawal Agriculture 18.

30.05.2005 2K-12M 1,62,500 5,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 19.

09.05.2005 2 K 1,50,000 6,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 20.

16.05.2005 5K-4M 2,60,000 4,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 21.

23.05.2005 3K-16M 2,37,000 4,98,947 Bawal Agriculture 22.

01.06.2005 2 K 1,50,000 6,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 23.

02.06.2005 7K-5M 2,25,000 2,48,276 Bawal Agriculture 24.

02.06.2005 30K-4M 11,25,000 2,98,013 Bawal Agriculture 25.

07.06.2005 14K-9M 21,00,000 11,62,630 Bawal Agriculture 26.

07.06.2005 4K-16M 7,00,000 11,66,667 Bawal Agriculture 27.

13.06.2005 33 K 45,00,000 10,90,909 Bawal Agriculture 28.

20.06.2005 4K-16M 7.00,000 11,66,667 Bawal Agriculture 29.

24.06.2005 3K-17M 3,00,000 6,23,377 Bawal Agriculture 30.

27.06.2005 3 K 2,50,000 6,66,667 Bawal Agriculture 31.

28.06.2005 12K9,00,000 5,69,170 Bawal Agriculture 13M 32.

28.06.2005 12 K 9,00,000 6,00,000 Bawal Agriculture 33.

28.06.2005 9K-1M 6,78,800 6,00,044 Chirahara Agriculture 34.

22.12.2003 5 M 36,000 11,52,000 Chirahara Plot 35.

13.08.2003 3 M 18,000 9,60,000 Chirahara Plot 36.

26.05.2003 9K-9M 6,00,000 5,07.936.50 Chirahara Agriculture 37.

20.05.2004 13 M 60,000 7,38,461.53 Chirahara Agriculture 38.

20.05.2004 1K-2M 1,00,000 7,27,272.72 Chirahara Agriculture 39.

28.04.2004 1 K 1,21,000 9,68,000 Suthani Agriculture 40.

29.09.2003 2 M 12,000 9,60,000 Jalalpur Gair Mumkin 41.

15.04.2003 16 K 8,00,000 4,00,000 Suthani Agriculture 42.

09.01.2007 1K-13M 1,65,000 8,00,000 Banipur Agriculture 3.3 The parties have also examined the following witnesses to prove the potentiality of the acquired land, its location and the prevailing market value at the relevant time:- 1.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Bawal, the land

owners have examined Ran Singh as PW.1, Jang Bahadur as PW.2, S.S.Lamba, Manager, HSIIDC, as PW.3, Kailash Chand, Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.4, Suresh Chand as PW.5 and Mahabir Yadav, Civil Draftsman, as PW.6.

PW.1 Ran Singh and PW.2 Jang Bahadur have filed identical affidavits explaining the location of the acquired land. They have highlighted that the HSIIDC has sold a hotel site @ 3,250/- per square meter. PW.3 S.S.Lamba, Manager, ₹ HSIIDC, has also brought the allotment letter of the hotel site. PW.4 Kailash Chand, Registration Clerk, has proved the copies of the sale deeds. PW.5 Suresh Chand is also one of the owners of the agricultural land. PW.6 Mahabir Yadav has produced and proved the layout plan.On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Rajiv Kumar, Computer Operator-cum-Clerk, in the office of the LAC-cum-SDO(Civil), Rewari, as RW.1. He has produced and proved the notification under Section 4 and 6 of the 1894 Act and the award passed by the Land Acquisition Collector.

Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, has been examined as RW.2, who admitted that in the years 1992, 1995, 2005 and 2008, the industrial model township was developed in the villages, namely Chilhana, Suthana, Suthani, Jaliawas, Asalwas, Banipur, Jalalpur, Rudh and Patuhera. Sunil, Registration Clerk, Tehsil Bawal, has appeared as RW.

deeds.

2.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Suthani, the land owners have examined Ram Singh, Lambardar, as PW.1, Subhash as PW.2, Abhey Singh, Legal Assistant, HSIIDC, Bawal, as PW.3, Om Parkash, Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.4, Kailash Chand, Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.5, Rakesh Kumar, Patwari Halqa Karnawas, as PW.6, Kuldeep, Patwari Halqa Sulkha, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8. On the other hand, the same witnesses have been examined by the respondent-HSIIDC as noticed in the reference petition arising from the village Bawal.

3.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Chirhara, the land owners have examined Jaswant Kumar as PW.1, Bhoom Singh as PW.2, Kuldeep, Patwari Halqa Sulkha, as PW.3, Abhey Singh, Legal Assistant, HSIIDC, Bawal, as PW.4, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8.

On the other hand, the same witnesses have been examined by the respondent-HSIIDC as noticed in the reference petition arising from the village Bawal.

4.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Patuhera, the land owners have examined Gordhan as PW.1, Karan Singh as PW.2, Rakesh Kumar, Patwari Halqa Karnawas, as PW.3, Ram Kumar, Patwari Halqa Banipur, as PW.4, S.S.Lamba, Manager, HSIIDC, as PW.5, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cumLAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8.

On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, as RW.1 and Jitender Kumar, Clerk in the office of the SDM, Bawal, as RW.2. 5.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Karnawas, the land owners have examined Som Dutt as PW.1, Soba Ram as PW.2, Abhey Singh, Legal Assistant, HSIIDC, Bawal, as PW.3, Om Parkash, Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.4, Rakesh Kumar, Patwari Halqa Karnawas, as PW.5, Mahabir Yadav, Civil Draftsman, as PW.6, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8.

On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Rajiv Kumar, Computer Operator-cum-Clerk, in the office of the LAC-cum-SDO(Civil), Rewari, as RW.1, Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, as RW.2, Sunil, Registration clerk,

Tehsil Bawal, as RW.3 and Narender Kumar, Assistant Registration Clerk, Tehsil Rewari, as RW.4.

6.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Banipur, the land owners have examined Ramphal as PW.1, Ram Singh as PW.2, Santosh Anand, Patwari Circle Bawal, as PW.3, Kailash Chand, Registry Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.5, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DROcum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8. On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Rajiv Kumar, Computer Operator-cum-Clerk, in the office of the LAC-cum-SDO(Civil), Rewari, as RW.1, Om Parkash, Clerk, HRC Branch in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Rewari, as RW.2, Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, as RW.3 and Jitender Kumar, Clerk in the office of the SDM, Bawal, as RW.4.

7.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Asalwas, the land owners have examined Banwari as PW.1, Ramphal as PW.2, Rakesh Kumar, Patwari Halqa Karnawas, as PW.3, Ram Kumar, Patwari Halqa Banipur, as PW.4, S.S.Lamba, Manager, HSIIDC, as PW.5, Jitender Kumar, Assistant Registration Clerk, Bawal, as PW.6, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cumLAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the

office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8.

On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Rajiv Kumar, Computer Operator-cum-Clerk, in the office of the LAC-cum-SDO(Civil), Rewari, as RW.1, Om Parkash, Clerk, HRC Branch in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Rewari, as RW.2, Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, as RW.3 and Jitender Kumar, Clerk in the office of the SDM, Bawal, as RW.4.

8.

In the proceedings before the Reference Court arising from the acquisition of the land of village Jaliawas, the land owners have examined Dhan Singh as PW.1, Jaswant Singh as PW.2, Kuldeep, Patwari Halqa Sulkha, as PW.3, Abhey Singh, Legal Assistant, HSIIDC, Bawal, as PW.4, Kailash Chand, Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub Registrar, Bawal, as PW.5, Mahabir Yadav, Civil Draftsman, as PW.6, Sunil Kumar, Ahlmad to SDO(Civil)-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.7 and Rajender Singh, Patwari in the office of the DRO-cum-LAC, Rewari, as PW.8.

On the other hand, the respondent-HSIIDC has examined Ashok Kumar, an official of the HSIIDC, as RW.1 and Sunil, Registration Clerk, Tehsil Bawal, has appeared as RW2. 4.

ARGUMENTS OF THE LEARNED COUNSELS REPRESENTING THE PARTIES 4.1 The learned Senior counsel representing the HSIIDC submits that the Reference Court has committed a material error in relying upon the sale exemplars of tiny pieces of residential or commercial plots to determine the market value of the agricultural land. The court below has also erred in refusing to take into consideration the sale exemplars produced by the HSIIDC on the ground that the aforesaid sale deeds reflect a price lower than the amount awarded by the LAC and therefore, these cannot be taken into

consideration. The Reference Court has further erred in observing that the LAC has assessed the land on the basis of the Collector's rate, whereas it is proved on the file that the State Government had constituted a Committee headed by the Commissioner of the concerned Division for assessing the market value of the acquired land. Further, while drawing the attention of the Court to the sale deeds produced by the State, he contends that even if the sale deeds with regard to the smaller sized plots are ignored and the six sale deeds showing the higher price are taken into consideration, still the average price per acre will come to 9,79,486/-.

Further, he contends that the sale ₹ deeds, relied upon by the Court, have mostly been executed and registered in the month of October, 2005, whereas the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act is dated 02.12.2005. He submits that the afore referred sale deeds have been executed only to jack up the price or mislead the Court. 4.2 Per contra, the learned counsels representing the land owners have relied upon the allotment letter issued by the HSIIDC on 27.04.2006 with respect to a hotel site, whereby 3456 square meters of the area was sold for a total consideration of 15,50,00,000/-. They further contend that the ₹ Court has erred in applying 50% cut towards the development charges. They rely upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Major General Kapil Mehra v.

Union of India (2015) 2 SCC 262 to contend that only 30% cut could have been imposed. The HSIIDC has already developed the adjoining area as a large number of industries have come up.

M/s Asian Cane Limited, M/s Haryana Pashpati Woolen Limited, M/s Musashi Limited, M/s YKK Limited and M/s Nerolac Limited, have already set up their industries and started operating from the nearby area. It has further been alleged that the Bawal Town is located at 1-2 Kms. and the National Highway No. 72 passes close to the acquired land. The Maharishi Vidya Mandir Public School and Research Center of the Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, have also come up in the nearby area. They further, while drawing the attention of the Court to the acquisition of the land in village Rudh vide notification dated 08.04.2004, contend that the Reference Court had assessed the market value of the land @ 24,36,000/- ₹ per acre. While relying upon the judgment passed in Special Land Acquisition Officer & Another v. M.K. Rafiq Saheb (2011) 7 SCC 714, they submit that the sale deeds of the smaller sized plots cannot be ignored by the Court while assessing the market value.

5.

DISCUSSION 5.1 The market value of the acquired land is to be determined on the date of issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act i.e. 02.12.2005. In other words, the crucial date for determination of the market value of the land in these cases is 02.12.2005. Section 15 of the 1894 Act provides that the Collector shall be guided by the provisions contained in Section 23 and 24 of the 1894 Act in determining the amount of compensation. Section 23, 24 and 25 of the 1894 Act are extracted as under:- "23. Matters to be considered in determining compensation-

(1) In determining the amount of compensation to be awarded

for land acquired under this Act, the Court shall take into considerationfirst the market-value of the land at the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4, sub-section (1). secondly the damage sustained by the person interested, by reason of the taking of any standing crops or trees which may be on the land at the time of the Collector's taking possession thereof;

thirdly the damage (if any) sustained by the person interested, at the time of the Collector's taking possession of the land, by reason of severing such land from his other land; fourthly the damage (if any) sustained by the person interested, at the time of the Collector's taking possession of the land, by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting his other property, movable or immovable, in any other manner, or his earnings;

fifthly if, in consequence of the acquisition of the land by the Collector, the person interested is compelled to change his residence or place of business, the reasonable expenses (if any) incidental to such change, and sixthly the damage (if any) bona fide resulting from diminution of the profits of the land between the time of the publication of the declaration under Section 6 and the time of the Collector's taking possession of the land.

(1-A) In addition to the market-value of the land, as above

provided, the Court shall in every case award an amount calculated at the rate of twelve per centum per annum of such market-value for the period commencing on and from the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4, subsection (1), in respect of such land to the date of the award of the Collector or the date of taking possession of the land, whichever is earlier.

Explanation.-In computing the period referred to in this subsection, any period or periods during which the proceedings for the acquisition of the land were held up on account of any stay or injunction by the order of any court shall be excluded. (2) In addition to the market-value of the land, as above provided, the Court shall in every case award a sum of[thirty per centum] on such market-value, in consideration of the compulsory nature of the acquisition.

24.

Matters to be neglected in determining compensation -But the Court shall not take into considerationfirst, the degree of urgency which has led to the acquisition; secondly, any disinclination of the person interested to part with the land acquired;

thirdly, any damage sustained by him, which, if caused by a private person, would not render such person liable to a suit; fourthly, any damage which is likely to be caused to the land acquired, after the date of the publication of the declaration under Section 6, by or in consequence of the use to which it will

be put;

fifthly, any increase to the value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put when acquired; sixthly, any increase to the value of the other land of the person interested likely to accrue from the use to which the land acquired will be put;

seventhly, any outlay or improvements on, or disposal of, the land acquired, commenced, made or effected without the sanction of the Collector after the date of the publication of the [notification under Section 4, sub-section (1); or eighthly, any increase to the value of the land on account of its being put to any use which is forbidden by land or opposed to public policy.

25. Amount of compensation awarded by court not to be lower than the amount award by the Collector - The amount of compensation awarded by the Court shall not be less than the amount awarded by the Collector under Section 11." 5.2 On a careful scanning of the aforesaid provisions, it becomes crystal clear that while determining the market value, the matters which are required to be considered have been enlisted in Section 23 of the 1894 Act whereas the matters which are to be ignored are enlisted in Section 24 of the 1894 Act. This Court, while interpreting the provisions in Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation v. Kulbir and Others (Regular First Appeal No. 4163 of 2017, decided on 01.09.2017) has observed as under:-

"4.5 It is apparent from the reading of the first part of Section 23 of the 1894 Act that the market value of the land is required to be determined on the date of publication of the notification under Section 4 (1) of 1894 Act. Hence, the crucial date for determining the market value is 09.06.2006. No further guidelines for assessment of the amount have been provided in the 1894 Act.

Sub-section 1-A of section 23 of the 1894 Act provides that while determining the amount of compensation to be awarded for the land acquired, the court apart from the market value of the land, is also required to award an amount calculated at the rate of 12% per annum at such market value for the period commencing on and from the date of publication of notification under Section 4 (1) of the 1894 Act till the date of award passed by the Collector or till the date of taking possession of the land, whichever is earlier. Under sub-section 2 of section 23 of the 1894 Act, the court, in addition to the market value of the land, is required to award a sum of 30% on such market value towards compulsory nature of the acquisition.

Section 24 of the 1894 Act enlists the various factors which are required to be ignored while determining the market value. Section 25 of the 1894 Act provides that the court shall not award the amount of compensation which is lower than the amount awarded by the Collector.

4.6 It is apparent from the reading of the aforesaid statutory provisions that while determining the market value of the

acquired land, the court is required to examine the existing geographical location of the acquired land apart from its existing and potential use. The Court is also required to examine as to whether the acquired land has proximity to the National Highway or the State Highway Road or any developed area. The market value of the other land situated in the same locality/area or adjacent to or very near to the acquired land can also be taken into consideration by the Court. While assessing the market value, the Court is required to see as to what would be the price on which a willing seller would sell the land to a willing purchaser. While assessing such compensation, one of the method is to assess the market value by comparable sale method i.e. by referring to contemporaneous transactions.

4.7 While adjudicating the market value of the acquired land, the Courts are expected to award "just" and "appropriate" amount on the basis of the material available on record. The Court is not expected to distribute the public money with largesse. It is the duty of the Court to maintain a proper equilibrium between the interest of the parties and the public interest, in general. If the Courts lean in favour of the landowners, the government or the allottees are likely to be unnecessarily overburdened and it will result in distributing the public money without limits thereby impacting the public interest, at large whereas if the courts are inclined towards the

government, it can result in undermining of just claims. Therefore, a proper balance has to be drawn guided by the facts of case and to preserve the public interest and the public resources, as a whole".

5.3 Apart from the sale deeds, the owners have also relied upon certain judgments of various Courts assessing the amount of market value with respect to the acquisition of land in the area. Firstly, it would be appropriate to notice the aforesaid judgments/awards passed by the Courts and the LAC. With respect to the acquisition of the land measuring 19 kanals and 17 marlas in village Rudh vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act dated 08.07.2004, the Reference Court assessed the market value of the land @ 24,36,000/- per acre. However, the village Rudh is not a part of this ₹ acquisition. Furthermore, the owners have failed to lead any evidence to prove that the land at village Rudh is identically situated as the land in the present case or as to the factors which show parity in the price of the land in these two villages.

Such assessments can be relied upon by the Court only if parity is established in every sphere by leading evidence. Once there exists numerous sale exemplars, it is not appropriate to solely rely upon an assessment by the Court, particularly when the evidence to prove parity in every sphere is lacking.

5.4 The next judgment relied upon by the land owners is in Ashrafi and Others v. State of Haryana and Others (2013) 5 SCC 527. This judgment has been relied upon to impress that the cut applied by the reference court is excessive. It should be only 1/3rd and not 50%. The next judgment relied upon by the owners is in Regular First Appeal No. 207 of

2006 decided on 21.01.2016 (Kishan and Others v. State of Haryana and Others and other connected cases). In this case, vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act dated 18.05.1999, 373 kanals and 18 marlas of land located in village Asalwas was acquired which is one of the villages involved in these appeals. The Court has assessed the market value of the land @ 12,37,840/- per acre. Apart from that, reliance is also placed upon ₹ the award No. 9 dated 04.12.2014 relating to the acquisition of the land in village Deodhi vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act dated 14.02.2011.

The LAC had assessed the market value of the land @ 70,67,138/- The award, in the last mentioned case, was passed under the ₹ Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2013 Act") which came to be enforced w.e.f. 01.01.2014. The land located in village Deodhi is not a part of the present acquisition and the evidence to prove that the land of village Deodhi is comparable with the acquired land is not available. Further, once the sale exemplars of the land situated in the same village are available, it is not appropriate to rely upon the assessment made by the Collector with respect to another village. 5.5 The owners have further relied upon the decision of the High Court in Executive Engineer/Construction, Northern Railway Rohtak v.

Mamchand and Others (Regular First Appeal No. 2189 of 2012, decided on 13.05.2016). Acquisition of the land in the aforesaid case was initiated on 28.06.2007 by issuing a notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act to acquire the land in the villages of Palhawas, Chandanwas and Rohrai. The Court has assessed the market value of the land @ 70,40,000/- per acre.

However, the land of these villages is not a part of the acquisition in question. The owners have also relied upon the award No. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of 30.11.2016, respectively, issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1956 Act"). In all these cases, the notification under Section 3A of the 1956 Act was issued on 10.09.2008 and the Competent Authority under the 1956 Act has assessed the market value of the acquired land between 1,00,00,000/- per ₹ acre to 1,23,33,300/- per acre. However, this acquisition is approximately ₹ 3 years after the issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act in the present case. They have also relied upon the judgment passed by the High Court in Nand Ram and Others v. State of Haryana and Others (Regular First Appeal No.

3541 of 2006 decided on 14.09.2010), wherein vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act dated 11.12.1995, the land situated in the villages of Chirhara, Jaliawas, Suthani, Asalwas, Suthana and Jalalpur was acquired. The matter was finally determined by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in HSIIDC v. Nand Ram and Others (Civil Appeal No. 9553 of 2011, decided on 26.11.2014) wherein while resorting to the determination made by the Reference Court, the Court held that the owners shall be entitled to 8,00,000/- per acre upto the depth of 500 yards from the ₹ national highway, whereas the owners on the remaining land were held entitled to the market value of the land @ 6,00,000/- per acre.

In the ₹ absence of any other evidence, the court may have attempted to assess the market value on the basis of the assessment made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nand Ram's case (supra) by applying appropriate increase for every passing year, however, such method is fraught with huge risk.

market value never increases constantly and consistently. The increase of price of land is never in a straight line and there can never be a constant and uniform increase in the value every year. However, once the parties have produced sale deeds of contemporaneous period which are considered sufficient for the court to arrive at a conclusion with a reasonable certainty, then it is not appropriate to rely upon such assessment made way back in the year 1995 i.e. ten years prior to the acquisition in the present case. 5.6 Reliance is also placed upon the judgment passed by the Reference Court on 09.02.2011 while assessing the market value of the land as on 06.01.2006.

The Court has assessed the market value of the land @ 1,700/- square yard with respect to the land which was utilized for ₹ developing Sector 6 and 7 by the Haryana Urban Development Authority, Rewari. The owners have failed to bring any evidence to prove its comparative location with the acquired land in the present case. They have also relied upon the judgment passed by the Additional District Judge on 21.01.2012 when the acquisition of land in village Dhailwas was initiated by issuing the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act on 27.01.2003. The Reference Court had assessed the market value of the land @ 20,00,000/- ₹ per acre. However, no evidence to prove its comparative location viz-a-viz the acquired land has been led. They have also relied upon a judgment passed by the Reference Court on 25.11.

2009 with respect to the acquisition of the land within the municipal limits of Rewari vide notification dated 24.12.2002. The Reference Court had assessed the market value of the land @ 1,700/- per square yard.

acquired in that case. The next judgment relied upon by the owners is the award of the Reference Court dated 26.02.2013 with respect to the acquisition of the land in the Rewari City vide notification dated 21.08.2003 wherein the Reference Court had determined the market value of the land @ 1,650/- per square yard. The Reference Court, in the present case, has not ₹ relied upon the aforesaid document as no evidence to compare the location of the acquired land in the present case and the acquired land in the aforesaid case was led.

5.7 The next judgment relied upon by the owners is with respect to the acquired land located in village Lisana vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act issued on 06.11.2006. The Reference Court vide judgment dated 11.08.2010 assessed the market value of the land @ 20,00,000/- per ₹ acre. The village Lisana is not a part of the present acquisition and the owners have again failed to lead any evidence to prove its comparative location. They have further relied upon the award No. 31/R of 2006-07 with respect to acquisition of land in the village Chandpur vide notification dated 27.01.2003 under Section 4 of the 1894 Act. The LAC had assessed the amount @ 12,50,000/- per acre.

₹ 5.8 Furthermore, the land owners have relied upon award No. 23 of the year 2006-07 with respect to the acquisition of 299.46 acres of land in village Rewari. The acquisition was initiated vide notification dated 06.01.2006 under Section 4 of the 1894 Act of the 1894 Act. The LAC had assessed the market value @ 12,50,000/- per acre. Additionally, the land ₹ owners have also relied upon the award No. 31 of the year 2006-07 acquiring 95.36 acres of land located in the village Chandpur and the

notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act, in this regard, was issued on 27.01.2003. The LAC had assessed the market value @ 12,50,000/- per ₹ acre. The land owners have also relied upon award No. 32 of the year 200607 with respect to the acquisition of the land measuring 103.90 acres of land in the village Piwra and the relevant notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act was issued on 27.01.2003. The LAC had assessed the market value @ 12,50,000/- per acre.

₹ The owners have also relied upon the judgment passed by the Reference Court on 30.09.2009 with respect to the acquisition of the land in the village Padiawas. The acquisition was initiated vide notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act dated 21.07.2003 and was completed vide an award No. 35 by the LAC. However, the village Padiawas is not a part of the present acquisition and there is no evidence on record to prove its comparative location. Hence, the determination made by the various Courts and the assessment made by the Land Acquisition Collector in all the cases referred to above does not help the Court to determine the market value of the acquired land in the present appeals.

This Bench endeavoured to take into consideration the awards passed by the authorities under the 1956 Act in the year 2000 while making an attempt to impose an appropriate cut. However, from a glance at item No. 33 in Table "A", it is apparent that the land measuring 4 kanals and 3 marlas located in village Karnawas has been sold @ 5,71,000/-. The average price comes to ₹ 11,00,722/-. This sale deed is approximately after a period of two years ₹ from the date of notification issued under Section 4 of the 1894 Act in the present case. This is an indication that the prices of the agricultural land did not increase by leaps and bounds.

5.9 Furthermore, it is evident that there is no prohibition for the Court to take into consideration the sale deeds depicting the price lower than the amount assessed by the LAC. Section 25 of the 1894 Act only debars the Court to award an amount lower than the amount awarded by the Collector (Lal Chand v. Union of India and Another (2009)5 SCC 769). Thus, the Additional District Judge has erred in refusing to take into consideration the sale exemplars produced by the State. 5.10 The Reference Court has also committed an error in taking into consideration the sale deeds at item No. 16 and 28 to 31 while assessing the market value of the acquired land. The land in all these sale deeds is not agricultural in nature. It is evident on a careful perusal of Table "A" that the sale deed at item No.

16 is only with respect to 15 marlas of land and the sale deeds from item No. 29 to 31 are also of land measuring less than 1 kanal. The sale deed at item No. 28 is with regard to a residential plot, although of a reasonable size. The Reference Court, after taking the average of these six sale deeds has chosen to apply a cut to the extent of 15% as development expenses and thus, arrived at a conclusion that the market value is @ 19,30,491/-. It is apparent that the Reference Court has ignored ₹ the sale deed of the agricultural land at item No. 2 and 33 of Table "A" and the sale deeds produced by the HSIIDC in Table "B". 5.

11 Furthermore, while assessing the market value of the agricultural land measuring more than 1000 acres, the Court cannot be expected to determine the market value on the basis of the sale exemplars of the non-agricultural land like commercial and residential plots of very small sizes.

upon such sale exemplars after finding that there is no comparable sale exemplar. However, in the present case, the sale exemplars of the agricultural land with regard to the period immediately prior to the issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act are available. Thus, the Reference Court committed an error while relying upon the sale deeds of the residential plots of smaller sizes and ignoring the sale deeds of the agricultural land. A marla of land is 1/160th part of an acre of land. The Reference Court has also overlooked that the land owners of village Suthani did produce Ex.P5/B, a sale deed dated 29.08.2005 (at item No. 2 in Table "A") with respect to the land measuring 4 kanals and 15 marlas for a sale consideration of 7,15,000/-. The per acre price works out to 12,04,210/-.

₹ ₹ In fact, the land owners have produced the sale deed noted at item No. 2 and 33 in Table "A" with respect to the sale of the agricultural land before the issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act. The remaining sale deeds are with respect to land for residential or commercial purposes. The sale deed dated 04.07.2003 (Ex.PW.5/A at item No. 36 in Table "A") is with respect to the land measuring 16 kanals, located in village Jaliawas, which is an industrial plot sold along with the building for a total consideration of ₹ 27,70,502/-. The average price works out to 13,85,251/- ₹ per acre. M/s Mahavir Foods has sold the existing industry along with the building. Thus, the aforesaid sale deed cannot be relied upon to determine the market value of the agricultural land.

At this stage, it is important to examine the sale exemplars at item No. 28 in Table "A". This sale deed is with respect to a residential plot measuring 2 kanals. Hence, this cannot be made the basis to assess the market value of the land in question.

owners have also produced the sale deeds dated 10.04.2008 (Item No. 38 in table A), 12.12.2007 (item No. 39 in table A) and 16.11.2007 (item No. 40 in table A). These are with respect to the land measuring 85 kanals 16 marlas, 32 kanals 04 marlas and 58 kanals 15 marlas, respectively. However, these sale exemplars cannot be relied upon as these have been executed subsequent to the date of issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act in the present case and even the land alleged to be sold is located in village Deodhai. No evidence has been led to prove the comparative location of the land situated in village Deodhai with the acquired land. 5.12 The HSIIDC has produced copies of various sale deeds of the agricultural land/plots of various sizes.

From a careful examination of the information compiled in the tabulated form, it is apparent that in item No.24 of Table "B", the sale is of nearly 4 acres of land. The land has been sold at the rate of 2,98,013/- per acre in village Bawal. Vide sale deeds dated ₹ 14.03.2005 (item No. 11) and 13.06.2005 (item No. 27), the land has been sold on an average price ranging between 10,00,000/- to 11,00,000/- ₹ ₹ .

Apart therefrom, there is a sale of the land measuring 2 acres in village Suthani on 15.04.2003 (item No. 41 in Table "B") for a sum of 8,00,000/-, ₹ the average price per acre comes to 4,00,000/- only. Even if the Court ₹ ignores the sale deeds of smaller plots of agricultural land produced by the HSIIDC and relies upon the sale deed depicting the highest sale price, it is still nowhere comparable to the amount awarded by the Reference Court. The LAC has assessed the market value of the land @ 12,50,000/- per acre. ₹ It is important to note that the official of the HSIIDC i.e. Ashok Kumar, who appeared as RW.2 in the case arising from the village Bawal, has admitted

that the HSIIDC has already developed some part of the land in 9 villages i.e. Chirhara, Suthana, Suthani, Jaliawas, Asalwas, Banipur, Jalalpur, Rudh, Patukhera in the year 1992, 1995, 2005 and 2008, respectively, on both the sides of the NH-8. The plots have already been allotted to the industries and the factories have been built and have started operating. Despite this, the market value of the land did not show any upward trend. Moreover, the Court is required to determine the market value of the land on the basis of the evidence produced. The Court is required to look for comparable sale transactions while assessing the market value on the basis of contemporaneous sale transactions. Once the Court is called upon to assess the market value of an agricultural land and the comparable sales transactions of agricultural land are available, it is not appropriate to rely upon the sale deeds of the residential or the commercial plots of minuscule sizes.

5.13 The learned counsel representing the land owners have heavily relied upon the allotment of plot measuring 3456 square meters as a hotel site for 15,50,00,000/-. However, it has come in the evidence, which is not ₹ disputed by the land owners, that the aforesaid allotment was cancelled and the plot was re-transferred vide order dated 19.04.2012 as the allottee failed to pay the amount. Furthermore, a hotel site in a developed area, which is expected to be located in a prime area, cannot be relied upon to assess the market value of an agricultural land.

5.14 The learned counsel representing the land owners have also drawn the attention of the Court to the assessment of the market value of the land by the various Reference Courts. It would be noted here that the ideal

judicial determination of the market value of the land is by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nand Ram's case (supra). In the aforesaid case, the Court assessed the market value of the land of the same villages as on 11.12.1995 @ 6,00,000/- per acre. The learned counsels have submitted that the ₹ market value of the land should be arrived at by adding an increase of 12% per year. In the absence of other sale exemplars of contemporaneous period, the Court may be required to resort to the aforesaid method. However, as already noticed, in the present case, in the year 2005 itself, there are at least three sale deeds of approximately 4 acres of land showing that the sale price has been revolving around 10,00,000/- per acre. In such a situation, it is not ₹ prudent for the Court to assess the market value by overlooking the direct evidence, while resorting to an assessment of the market value based upon assumptions.

5.15 Moreover, the oral evidence led by the parties, at the most, prove that the acquired land has the potential to be used for industrial purposes, however, this in itself is not sufficient to arrive at the market value of the acquired land. Once, the sale deeds of the comparable land are available, the oral evidence cannot be relied upon to determine the market value. The parties have also produced the various site plans/layout plans but they are of no significance. No effort has been made to depict/identify the location of the plots represented by various sale deeds viz-a-viz the acquired land. The parties ought to have produced a comprehensive layout plan to enable the Court to compare the location of the various pieces of land sold by the sale deeds produced in the evidence and compare the same. 5.16 Now, let us analyse the judgments relied upon by the learned

counsels representing the land owners. The first judgment is Major General Kapil Mehra's case (supra). In the aforesaid case, 12 bighas land in Vasant Kunj, Delhi, was sought to be acquired for developing Vasant Kunj. The Court, after finding that the comparable sale deeds are of smaller plots when compared to the extent of land sought to be acquired, directed that 35% deduction towards the development shall be appropriate to arrive at the market value of the acquired land. The relevant discussion is in para 29 to 41 of the SCC Report.

In the present case, once the comparable sale deeds of contemporaneous period are available with respect to the agricultural land, then in the considered view of this Court, it is not appropriate to rely upon the sale deeds of the smaller plots which are being sold and purchased for residential and commercial purposes. In the present case, the Court is called upon to determine the market value of a land which is agricultural in nature and was being used for agricultural purposes. 5.17 As regards the judgment in M.K. Rafiq Saheb's case (supra), it is noted that the Supreme Court applied a 60% cut, after noticing that the price is required to be determined by comparable sales method, while relying upon the plots of a smaller area.

In the aforesaid case, the Court found that the comparable sale deeds, of pieces of a land of a reasonable size, were not available. In those facts, the Court applied deduction to the extent of 60%. However, as already noticed, in the present case, a large number of sale exemplars have been produced including that of an agricultural land. Hence, with highest respect, the aforesaid judgments, relied upon by the learned counsel representing the land owners, are not applicable.

5.18 At the time of hearing, the learned counsel representing the HSIIDC was requested to inform the Court as to whether the enhanced payment has been made to the landowners or not. The learned senior counsel has informed the Court that the landowners have already been paid @ 16,00,000/- per acre. It is left to the State to take a call on the question ₹ whether it intends to recover the excess amount from the farmers or not. By now, the HSIIDC might have passed on the burden of the amount of acquisition on the allottees of the industrial plots. In such an eventuality, it may not appropriate for the HSIIDC to unjustly enrich itself. 5.19 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this court finds that the Reference Court has assessed the market value of the land without appreciating the evidence in a proper perspective and therefore, all the reference applications are required to be dismissed. 5.20 In view of the discussion made in the foregoing paragraphs, the appeals filed by the HSIIDC are allowed whereas that of the land owners are hereby dismissed.

5.21 The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge September 23, 2021 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sr. No.

Case No.

Party Name 1.

RFA - 4410 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARKESH AND OTHERS 2.

RFA - 13694 - 2018 SHUBH RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

3.

RFA - 1462 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS 4.

RFA - 4961 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISHWAR SINGH & OTHERS 5.

RFA - 4436 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARAN SINGH & OTHERS 6.

RFA - 4400 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ATTAR SINGH AND OTHERS 7.

RFA - 296 - 2019 SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 8.

RFA - 1455 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MANGTIYA @ MANGTU RAM AND OTHERS 9.

RFA - 13699 - HOSHIYAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 10.

RFA - 4916 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PHOOL SINGH & OTHERS 11.

RFA - 13708 - 2018 MAM CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 12.

RFA - 13706 - 2018 HARKESH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 13.

RFA - 4929 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM PAT & OTHERS 14.

RFA - 1456 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS 15.

RFA - 4940 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ABHEY SINGH & OTHERS 16.

RFA - 13690 - 2018 SUMER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 17.

RFA - 1485 - 2018 RAMPAT (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 18.

RFA - 4437 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURENDER & OTHERS 19.

RFA - 1453 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. SAVITRI AND OTHERS 20.

RFA - 4434 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RATI RAM & OTHERS 21.

RFA - 13712 - 2018 ROSHNI AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 22.

RFA - 1446 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPAT AND OTHERS 23.

RFA - 301 - 2019 PHOOL SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 24.

RFA - 4906 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. KULWATI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS 25.

RFA - 4983 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S AMAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & OTHERS 26.

RFA - 1451 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAGHBIR AND OTHERS 27.

RFA - 4420 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS 28.

RFA - 1438 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS 29.

RFA - 4417 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR AND OTHERS 30.

RFA - 4432 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARKESH AND OTHERS 31.

RFA - 1495 - 2018 RAM KANWAR (SINCE DECEASEAD) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 32.

RFA - 4954 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S THAWARIA & OTHERS 33.

RFA - 4419 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS 34.

RFA - 4920 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ASHOK KUMAR & OTHERS 35.

RFA - 4910 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARTAR SINGH & OTHERS 36.

RFA - 8489 - 2018 MOHAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 37.

RFA - 1443 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR AND OTHERS

38.

RFA - 1440 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SATBIR AND OTHERS 39.

RFA - 4949 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KISHORI LAL & OTHERS 40.

RFA - 4925 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM SINGH & OTHERS 41.

RFA - 4902 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ASHOK KUMAR & OTHERS 42.

RFA - 4411 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS 43.

RFA - 4401 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN AND OTHERS 44.

RFA - 4912 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR & OTHERS 45.

RFA - 293 - 2019 SURAJ BHAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 46.

RFA - 1441 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM SINGH AND OTHERS 47.

RFA - 2066 - 2018 RAGHBIR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

48.

RFA - 4439 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LEKH RAM & OTHERS 49.

RFA - 13697 - 2018 SHUBH RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 50.

RFA - 13700 - 2018 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 51.

RFA - 4962 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHAMLU (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS 52.

RFA - 4928 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARTAP SINGH & OTHERS 53.

RFA - 1445 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS 54.

RFA - 4951 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS 55.

RFA - 256 - 2018 SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 56.

RFA - 1437 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS 57.

RFA - 320 - 2018 AJIT SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

58.

RFA - 13709 - 2018 MAM CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 59.

RFA - 4404 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S AMI CHAND AND OTHERS 60.

RFA - 4423 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. BHAGWANI & OTHERS 61.

RFA - 1489 - 2018 SAVITRI AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 62.

RFA - 4922 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISWAR SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS & OTHERS 63.

RFA - 13701 - 2018 SURAJ BHAN V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 64.

RFA - 4418 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. AMAR KAUR & OTHERS 65.

RFA - 1486 - 2018 SMT. SAVITRI AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 66.

RFA - 1459 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS 67.

RFA - 4930 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR & OTHERS 68.

RFA - 4950 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAM SINGH & OTHERS 69.

RFA - 303 - 2019 RAM KUNWAR @ RAM KUMAR SINCE DECEASED AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 70.

RFA - 4415 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JUG LAL & OTHERS 71.

RFA - 4943 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARTAR SINGH 72.

RFA - 4416 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISHWAR SINGH & OTHERS

73.

RFA - 4956 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARAN SINGH & OTHERS 74.

RFA - 4932 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM PAT & OTHERS 75.

RFA - 4957 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHRI RAM & OTHERS 76.

RFA - 13717 - 2018 RATTAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 77.

RFA - 302 - 2019 ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 78.

RFA - 4942 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BIR SINGH & OTHERS 79.

RFA - 300 - 2019 KARAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 80.

RFA - 4919 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAVI KUMAR & OTHERS 81.

RFA - 4953 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUMER SINGH & OTHERS 82.

RFA - 291 - 2019 ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 83.

RFA - 4397 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS 84.

RFA - 1460 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJENDER SINGH AND OTHERS 85.

RFA - 3199 - 2019 ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

86.

RFA - 4399 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT.SAHIB KAUR AND OTHERS 87.

RFA - 1448 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS 88.

RFA - 4939 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. CHHIMA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & OTHERS 89.

RFA - 4414 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARAN SINGH & OTHERS 90.

RFA - 4977 - 2018 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV CORP NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEV CORP LTD V/S MAM CHAND & OTHERS 91.

RFA - 13711 - 2018 MAM CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 92.

RFA - 1897 - 2018 SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS 93.

RFA - 13715 - 2018 SHUBH RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 94.

RFA - 13696 - 2018 RATTI RAM AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 95.

RFA - 866 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LEKH RAM & OTHERS 96.

RFA - 4915 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM NATH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & OTHERS 97.

RFA - 13692 - 2018 BHAGOTI DEVI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 98.

RFA - 4948 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBE SINGH & OTHERS 99.

RFA - 13703 - 2018 ATTAR SINGH AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

100. RFA - 1450 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SH.SITAR SINGH AND OTHERS

101. RFA - 4923 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MOHINDER SINGH & OTHERS

102. RFA - 290 - 2019 SMT. SAHIB KAUR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

103. RFA - 13695 - 2018 RAM SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

104. RFA - 8421 - 2018 JUG LAL AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. ADITYA SINGH YADAV

105. RFA - 4421 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHUBH RAM & OTHERS

106. RFA - 1457 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHARAT SINGH AND OTHERS

107. RFA - 4960 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS

108. RFA - 4921 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR & OTHERS

109. RFA - 469 - 2018 MANGTIYA @ MANGU RAM AND ANR. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

110. RFA - 4407 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHUPENDER & OTHERS

111. RFA - 4955 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BUDHA @ BUDH RAM & OTHERS

112. RFA - 4975 - 2018 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV CORP NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEV CORP LTD V/S MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

113. RFA - 13698 - 2018 SURAJ BHAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

114. RFA - 287 - 2019 MAHAVIR PARSHAD AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

115. RFA - 4472 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBE SINGH & OTHERS

116. RFA - 4433 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BUDHA SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS

117. RFA - 1452 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT.SAVITRI AND OTHERS

118. RFA - 4429 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

119. RFA - 4394 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPAT AND OTHERS

120. RFA - 4412 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS

121. RFA - 4430 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SATBIR AND OTHERS

122. RFA - 4469 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RATTAN SINGH & OTHERS

123. RFA - 4958 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. ROSHNI & OTHERS

124. RFA - 4941 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BIR SINGH & OTHERS

125. RFA - 1493 - 2018 SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

126. RFA - 1458 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS

127. RFA - 4974 - 2018 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV CORP NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEV CORP LTD V/S SHUBH RAM & OTHERS

128. RFA - 4431 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. CHANDRO (SINCE DECEASED) THRO HER LRS AND OTHERS

129. RFA - 1461 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAVI KUMAR AND OTHERS

130. RFA - 4435 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SITAR SINGH AND OTHERS

131. RFA - 4904 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHUBH RAM & OTHERS

132. RFA - 4938 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBEDAR & OTHERS

133. RFA - 292 - 2019 PARTAP SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

134. RFA - 13714 - 2018 LEKH RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

135. RFA - 321 - 2018 RAM KANWAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

136. RFA - 13688 - 2018 HARKESH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

137. RFA - 257 - 2018 LEKH RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

138. RFA - 4471 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURENDER SINGH & OTHERS

139. RFA - 1454 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. VIJAY KUMARI AND OTHERS

140. RFA - 13707 - 2018 ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

141. RFA - 13716 - 2018 RATTAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

142. RFA - 4911 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. KALAWATI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS

143. RFA - 13702 - 2018 THAWARIA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

144. RFA - 4395 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS

145. RFA - 295 - 2019 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

146. RFA - 4413 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS

147. RFA - 13704 - 2018 SHAMLU (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

148. RFA - 13689 - 2018 THAWARIA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

149. RFA - 4937 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. BHAGWANI & OTHERS

150. RFA - 4934 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HOSHIYAR SINGH & OTHERS

151. RFA - 1449 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS

152. RFA - 4914 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARTAP SINGH & OTHERS

153. RFA - 4963 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARMA PAL & OTHERS

154. RFA - 4403 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR DAYAL @ MANGE & OTHERS

155. RFA - 1444 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS

156. RFA - 1488 - 2018 BHARAT SINGH AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

157. RFA - 298 - 2019 RAM PAT SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

158. RFA - 13713 - 2018 SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

159. RFA - 4976 - 2018 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV CORP NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEV CORP LTD V/S MAHAVIR PARSHAD & OTHERS

160. RFA - 867 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBE SINGH & OTHERS

161. RFA - 4959 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S AMAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS

162. RFA - 4396 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS

163. RFA - 4426 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S THAWARIA & OTHERS

164. RFA - 4964 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HAR LAL & OTHERS

165. RFA - 4909 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHUBH RAM & OTHERS.

166. RFA - 4918 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAM SINGH & OTHERS

167. RFA - 8400 - 2018 RAM PAT V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

168. RFA - 4409 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS.

169. RFA - 4905 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISHWAR SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS & OTHERS

170. RFA - 1439 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR AND OTHERS

171. RFA - 13710 - 2018 ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

172. RFA - 1442 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR AND OTHERS

173. RFA - 1410 - 2019 SATBIR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

174. RFA - 4408 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MOHAN & OTHERS

175. RFA - 4901 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JUG LAL & OTHERS

176. RFA - 4428 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN & OTHERS

177. RFA - 4947 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM SINGH & OTHERS

178. RFA - 8401 - 2018 RAM PAT V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

179. RFA - 4981 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPAL & OTHERS

180. RFA - 1447 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS

181. RFA - 4425 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PYARE LAL & OTHERS

182. RFA - 4944 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ISHWAR SINGH & OTHERS

183. RFA - 4927 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR & OTHERS

184. RFA - 4945 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. BHAGWANI & OTHERS

185. RFA - 4903 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GRAM PANCHYAT VILLAGE BENIPUR & OTHERS

186. RFA - 8420 - 2018 JUG LAL AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

187. RFA - 4427 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAHAVIR PARSHAD & OTHERS

188. RFA - 8402 - 2018 RAM PAT V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

189. RFA - 4931 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAM CHAND & OTHERS

190. RFA - 2123 - 2018 SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS

191. RFA - 299 - 2019 MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

192. RFA - 4952 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ABHEY SINGH & OTHERS

193. RFA - 4470 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RATTAN SINGH & OTHERS

194. RFA - 4933 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS

195. RFA - 468 - 2018 ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

196. RFA - 4438 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJINDER & OTHERS

197. RFA - 4422 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KISHORI LAL & OTHERS

198. RFA - 4936 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJ SINGH & OTHERS

199. RFA - 13691 - 2018 SURAJ BHAN V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

200. RFA - 4913 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHUPENDER & OTHERS

201. RFA - 2128 - 2018 SUBEDAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

202. RFA - 4907 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ASHOK KUMAR & OTHERS

203. RFA - 4935 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS

204. RFA - 4424 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S OM PARKASH AND OTHERS

205. RFA - 13693 - 2018 SURAJ BHAN V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

206. RFA - 4926 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAM CHAND & OTHERS

207. RFA - 297 - 2019 DHARAM SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

208. RFA - 13705 - 2018 RAMESHWAR DAYAL @ MANGE & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

209. RFA - 1494 - 2018 RAM KANWAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS

AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

210. RFA - 310 - 2019 SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

211. RFA - 340 - 2020 BUDHA ALIAS BUDH RAM THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

212. RFA - 96 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN AND OTHERS

213. RFA - 342 - 2020 ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

214. RFA - 311 - 2019 SMT. BHAGWANI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

215. RFA - 312 - 2019 SMT. BHAGWANI (SINCE DECEASED) AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

216. RFA - 343 - 2020 RAJINDER (SINCE DECEASED) THORUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

217. RFA - 4946 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHARAT SINGH & OTHERS

218. RFA - 1411 - 2019 SATBIR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

219. RFA - 309 - 2019 ROOP CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

220. RFA - 370 - 2020 SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

221. RFA - 99 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAM SINGH AND OTHERS

222. RFA - 339 - 2020 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

223. RFA - 423 - 2020 SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

224. RFA - 316 - 2019 KARAN SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

225. RFA - 306 - 2019 KARAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

226. RFA - 374 - 2020 ROOP CHAND THROUGH HIS LR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

227. RFA - 313 - 2019 DHARAM PAL SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

228. RFA - 424 - 2020 ABHEY SINGH THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

229. RFA - 308 - 2019 SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

230. RFA - 375 - 2020 SURAJ BHAN AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

231. RFA - 377 - 2020 ROOP CHAND THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

232. RFA - 315 - 2019 RAM KUNWAR @ RAM KUMAR SINCE DECEASED AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

233. RFA - 118 - 2021 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED V/S RAMESHWAR DAYAL SINCE DECEASEDTHROUGH LRS AND OTHERS

234. RFA - 317 - 2019 AMI CHAND SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

235. RFA - 305 - 2019 MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

236. RFA - 2161 - 2019 RAM NATH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

237. RFA - 341 - 2020 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

238. RFA - 373 - 2020 ROOP CHAND THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

239. RFA - 4917 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S VIJAY SINGH & OTHERS

240. RFA - 3498 - 2019 KISHORI LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

241. RFA - 318 - 2019 ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

242. RFA - 307 - 2019 HUKAM SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

243. RFA - 319 - 2019 PYARE LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, REWARI

244. RFA - 304 - 2019 VIJAY SINGH SINCE DECEASED THRU HIS LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

245. RFA - 338 - 2020 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

246. RFA - 314 - 2019 KISHORI LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

247. RFA - 1639 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROHTASH AND OTHERS

248. RFA - 2275 - 2018 BALWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

249. RFA - 3688 - 2018 RAM PAL AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

250. RFA - 3642 - 2018 SATBIR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

251. RFA - 1600 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAHESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

252. RFA - 289 - 2019 DARA SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

253. RFA - 1619 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ARJAN AND OTHERS.

254. RFA - 219 - 2018 DALIP AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

255. RFA - 1581 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PAT RAM AND OTHERS

256. RFA - 1635 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SATBIR AND OTHERS

257. RFA - 3686 - 2018 GHEESA RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

258. RFA - 1595 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S CHANDGI AND OTHERS

259. RFA - 3107 - 2019 PARTAP (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

260. RFA - 1613 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALU RAM & OTHERS

261. RFA - 1636 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DALIP & OTHERS

262. RFA - 2063 - 2018 SEDU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

263. RFA - 2127 - 2018 SEDU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

264. RFA - 3470 - 2018 JAI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

265. RFA - 1625 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAGHBIR AND OTHERS

266. RFA - 1628 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PURNA AND OTHERS

267. RFA - 3386 - 2018 KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

268. RFA - 2277 - 2018 KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

269. RFA - 3693 - 2018 MANGE RAM AND ANR. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

270. RFA - 1641 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ABHEY SINGH AND OTHERS

271. RFA - 1590 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS

272. RFA - 1589 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JAI BHAGWAN (MINOR) & OTHERS.

273. RFA - 1601 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S CHANDGI RAM AND OTHERS

274. RFA - 1631 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ BHAN AND OTHERS

275. RFA - 1612 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RATTAN & OTHERS

276. RFA - 1648 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHEERIYA AND OTHERS

277. RFA - 3388 - 2018 SURJA (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

278. RFA - 1632 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHADI RAM AND OTHERS

279. RFA - 1603 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GOPI CHAND AND OTHERS

280. RFA - 1618 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KIRPA RAM AND OTHERS

281. RFA - 1585 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GHEESA RAM AND OTHERS

282. RFA - 1616 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. CHANDRO DEVI AND OTHERS

283. RFA - 1604 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. MURTI DEVI AND OTHERS

284. RFA - 1588 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S THAWAR SINGH AND OTHERS.

285. RFA - 1615 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM PAL & OTHERS

286. RFA - 1609 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURJA AND OTHERS

287. RFA - 1627 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BIJENDER AND OTHERS

288. RFA - 1620 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SEDHU AND OTHERS

289. RFA - 1596 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GRAM PANCHAYAT ASALWAS AND OTHERS.

290. RFA - 3682 - 2018 SHEO NARAIN (SINCE DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

291. RFA - 2982 - 2019 SHEERIYA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

292. RFA - 4034 - 2018 BHARAT SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

293. RFA - 1650 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS

294. RFA - 1629 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GYANI AND OTHERS

295. RFA - 1645 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SH. BHIM SINGH AND OTHERS

296. RFA - 1597 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SEDU AND OTHERS

297. RFA - 1630 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS

298. RFA - 1567 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MALHI AND OTHERS

299. RFA - 3471 - 2018 SMT. GYANA AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

300. RFA - 1638 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GHEESA RAM AND OTHERS

301. RFA - 1610 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHARAT SINGH AND OTHERS.

302. RFA - 1580 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHEO LAL AND OTHERS.

303. RFA - 1578 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHEO NARAIN AND OTHERS

304. RFA - 1622 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NIHAL SINGH & OTHERS.

305. RFA - 1566 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHEONARAYAN AND OTHERS

306. RFA - 3687 - 2018 GHEESA RAM (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

307. RFA - 1606 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHAJJU @ BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS

308. RFA - 1607 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NAND LAL AND OTHERS

309. RFA - 1652 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LAKHI RAM AND OTHERS

310. RFA - 1649 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS

311. RFA - 1602 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PRASADA AND OTHERS

312. RFA - 1634 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALWANT SINGH AND OTHERS

313. RFA - 1582 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MANGE RAM AND OTHERS

314. RFA - 1579 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHIM SINGH AND OTHERS.

315. RFA - 1637 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SEDU AND OTHERS

316. RFA - 1584 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS.

317. RFA - 1599 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GHEESA RAM AND OTHERS

318. RFA - 3683 - 2018 RAM CHANDER ( SINCE DECEASED) THRU HER LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

319. RFA - 3685 - 2018 ABHEY SINGH AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

320. RFA - 1642 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NATHU RAM AND OTHERS

321. RFA - 1651 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SEDU AND OTHERS.

322. RFA - 1626 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UDAI RAM AND OTHERS

323. RFA - 1592 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALLU RAM AND OTHERS

324. RFA - 1643 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KISHAN AND OTHERS.

325. RFA - 3371 - 2018 RAM CHANDER ( SINCE DECEASED) THRU HER LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

326. RFA - 1644 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHARATA AND OTHERS

327. RFA - 1611 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LAXMI NARAIN AND OTHERS.

328. RFA - 2563 - 2019 GHEESA RAM (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

329. RFA - 3472 - 2018 THAWAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

330. RFA - 4063 - 2018 NATHU RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

331. RFA - 3372 - 2018 GOPI CHAND @ GOPI RAM AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

332. RFA - 1598 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PITARIYA AND OTHERS

333. RFA - 1605 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. SANTA AND OTHERS

334. RFA - 1614 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARTAP AND OTHERS

335. RFA - 1591 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SULHAR AND OTHERS

336. RFA - 1594 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS.

337. RFA - 1583 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S CHANDRO DEVI AND OTHERS

338. RFA - 1624 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARI RAM AND OTHERS

339. RFA - 220 - 2018 KANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

340. RFA - 3684 - 2018 BHRAT SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

341. RFA - 3689 - 2018 SMT. MURTI DEVI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

342. RFA - 1587 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM PAL AND OTHERS

343. RFA - 1647 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. GINDO AND OTHERS

344. RFA - 4598 - 2018 SULHAR DECEASED THR LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

345. RFA - 1608 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. LAL KAUR AND OTHERS

346. RFA - 1593 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR DAYAL AND OTHERS.

347. RFA - 3692 - 2018 SHEO LAL AND ANR. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

348. RFA - 1586 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. INDRO AND OTHERS

349. RFA - 3389 - 2018 CHANDGI AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

350. RFA - 1633 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LEELA AND OTHERS

351. RFA - 3370 - 2018 CHANDGI RAM AND ANR. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

352. RFA - 1617 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHARAT SINGH AND OTHERS

353. RFA - 1653 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARTAP AND OTHERS

354. RFA - 2439 - 2019 ROHTASH (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

355. RFA - 1646 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

356. RFA - 1621 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KHADDU RAM AND OTHERS.

357. RFA - 3695 - 2018 UDAI RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

358. RFA - 1623 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM CHAND AND OTHERS.

359. RFA - 871 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPHOOL AND OTHERS

360. RFA - 4336 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JAI PAL SINGH AND OTHERS

361. RFA - 906 - 2021 RAM PHOOL AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND

OTHERS

362. RFA - 870 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MANGE RAM AND OTHERS

363. RFA - 117 - 2021 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED V/S SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS

364. RFA - 294 - 2019 OM PARKASH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

365. RFA - 103 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S OM PARKASH AND OTHERS

366. RFA - 8493 - 2018 JAGDISH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

367. RFA - 108 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S BHOOP SINGH AND OTHERS

368. RFA - 4378 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS.

369. RFA - 4389 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUKH RAM AND OTHERS.

370. RFA - 13737 - 2018 RAMSARUP DECEASED THRU HIS LRS AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

371. RFA - 905 - 2021 RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

372. RFA - 909 - 2021 SURAJ MAL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

373. RFA - 907 - 2021 BALBIR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

374. RFA - 113 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SUBH RAM AND OTHERS

375. RFA - 112 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S HARI RAM AND OTHERS

376. RFA - 4385 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DEVI SINGH AND OTHERS

377. RFA - 1806 - 2018 MANGE RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

378. RFA - 1032 - 2021 RAJ KARAN V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

379. RFA - 4391 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUKH RAM AND OTHERS.

380. RFA - 4373 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALBIR AND OTHERS.

381. RFA - 4382 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM DEVA AND OTHERS.

382. RFA - 1033 - 2021 RAM DEVA V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

383. RFA - 908 - 2021 NARENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

384. RFA - 104 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S NATHU RAM AND OTHERS

385. RFA - 4392 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DEVI SINGH AND OTHERS.

386. RFA - 106 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAM CHANDER DECESED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS

387. RFA - 4371 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUBE SINGH AND OTHERS.

388. RFA - 4375 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM PHOOL AND OTHERS.

389. RFA - 8488 - 2018 HARI RAM (DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

390. RFA - 109 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SMT. SAMAKAUR AND OTHERS

391. RFA - 4379 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SURAJ MAL AND OTHERS.

392. RFA - 110 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S AMI LAL AND OTHERS

393. RFA - 4338 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. ACHHNO DEVI AND OTHERS

394. RFA - 4387 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARAN SINGH AND OTHERS.

395. RFA - 111 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S MAM CHAND AND OTHERS

396. RFA - 4386 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARKASH AND OTHERS.

397. RFA - 114 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS

398. RFA - 102 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SUBH RAM AND OTHERS

399. RFA - 8490 - 2018 SARJIWAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

400. RFA - 8491 - 2018 RAM SINGH (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

401. RFA - 4388 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM SINGH & OTHERS

402. RFA - 869 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DAULAT RAM AND OTHERS

403. RFA - 4393 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJ KARAN & OTHERS

404. RFA - 115 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S HOSHIAR SINGH AND OTHERS

405. RFA - 720 - 2019 KAMLA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

406. RFA - 4337 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPAT AND OTHERS.

407. RFA - 4377 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARI RAM AND OTHERS.

408. RFA - 4383 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JAGDISH AND OTHERS

409. RFA - 4644 - 2018 MEGH SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

410. RFA - 4380 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMSARUP AND OTHERS.

411. RFA - 4342 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SANJAY AND OTHERS.

412. RFA - 2130 - 2018 KAUSHALYA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

413. RFA - 4343 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MEGH SINGH & OTHERS

414. RFA - 4345 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MEGH SINGH AND OTHERS.

415. RFA - 4384 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. BHAGWATI AND OTHERS

416. RFA - 4341 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAM SINGH AND OTHERS.

417. RFA - 288 - 2019 BHOM SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

418. RFA - 13597 - 2018 SMT. ANARO SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

419. RFA - 4381 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S OM PARKASH & OTHERS

420. RFA - 344 - 2020 JAI PAL SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

421. RFA - 4390 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NARENDER SINGH & OTHERS

422. RFA - 1044 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. KAMLA AND OTHERS

423. RFA - 4370 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GRAM PANCHAYAT SUTHANIAND OTHERS

424. RFA - 4594 - 2018 KABUL SINGH & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND

OTHERS

425. RFA - 4369 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GINDORI & OTHERS

426. RFA - 4344 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ABHEY SINGH AND OTHERS

427. RFA - 4663 - 2018 DHARAM SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

428. RFA - 4346 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KABUL SINGH AND OTHERS.

429. RFA - 581 - 2018 DAULAT RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

430. RFA - 4374 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DARA SINGH AND OTHERS.

431. RFA - 13591 - 2018 MEGH SINGH SINCE DECEASED THU HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

432. RFA - 4643 - 2018 RAMPAT & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

433. RFA - 4339 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. ANARO AND OTHERS.

434. RFA - 4376 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SARJIWAN AND OTHERS.

435. RFA - 4340 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHOM SINGH AND OTHERS.

436. RFA - 97 - 2021 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED V/S HUKAM SINGH AND OTHERS

437. RFA - 345 - 2020 KLHUSHAL SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

438. RFA - 107 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RATTI RAM AND OTHERS

439. RFA - 120 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S TRILOK CHAND AND OTHERS

440. RFA - 119 - 2021 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED V/S SMT.

SHEELA DEVI AND OTHERS

441. RFA - 904 - 2021 KARAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

442. RFA - 988 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KANWAR AND OTHERS.

443. RFA - 462 - 2018 CHET RAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

444. RFA - 2000 - 2018 GUR DAYAL SINCE DECEASED THRUOGH LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

445. RFA - 2147 - 2018 MAHENDER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

446. RFA - 1031 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KISHORE & OTHERS

447. RFA - 972 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHOOP SINGH & OTHERS

448. RFA - 1032 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PURAN CHAND & OTHERS

449. RFA - 976 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KISHORI LAL & OTHERS

450. RFA - 1027 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NATHU RAM AND OTHERS.

451. RFA - 1492 - 2018 DEEP CHAND AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

452. RFA - 959 - 2018 SITA RAM AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

453. RFA - 1015 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM SINGH AND OTHERS.

454. RFA - 1033 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM SINGH & OTHERS

455. RFA - 1040 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MUNSHI RAM AND OTHERS.

456. RFA - 113 - 2018 RAMESH CHAND AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

457. RFA - 2061 - 2018 ROSHAN LAL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

458. RFA - 994 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR AND OTHERS.

459. RFA - 1036 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR AND OTHERS.

460. RFA - 1018 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAKHAN LAL AND OTHERS.

461. RFA - 1903 - 2018 HUKAM SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

462. RFA - 2064 - 2018 UMRAO AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

463. RFA - 1020 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAKHAN LAL AND OTHERS

464. RFA - 991 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MAHENDER AND OTHERS

465. RFA - 1016 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S TEK CHAND @ CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS.

466. RFA - 1028 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHER BAHADUR AND OTHERS.

467. RFA - 974 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUNIL KUMAR & OTHERS

468. RFA - 990 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HANUMAN AND OTHERS.

469. RFA - 1042 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PARKASH AND OTHERS.

470. RFA - 982 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GAIN CHAND AND OTHERS.

471. RFA - 1019 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NATHU RAM AND OTHERS.

472. RFA - 958 - 2018 SITA RAM AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

473. RFA - 114 - 2018 RAM KISHORE AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

474. RFA - 5493 - 2017 SMT. KAUSHALYA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

475. RFA - 989 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GURDAYAL AND OTHERS

476. RFA - 1014 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UMRAO AND OTHERS.

477. RFA - 983 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMJI LAL AND OTHERS.

478. RFA - 2065 - 2018 HANS RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

479. RFA - 997 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S CHET RAM AND OTHERS.

480. RFA - 1013 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM SINGH AND OTHERS.

481. RFA - 1021 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR AND OTHERS.

482. RFA - 957 - 2018 SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

483. RFA - 1490 - 2018 KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

484. RFA - 1491 - 2018 HUKAM SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

485. RFA - 992 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S JODHA RAM AND OTHERS.

486. RFA - 1026 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DEEP CHAND AND OTHERS.

487. RFA - 1010 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GIAN CHAND AND OTHERS.

488. RFA - 1017 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MATADIN AND OTHERS.

489. RFA - 1038 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESH CHAND AND OTHERS.

490. RFA - 5494 - 2017 KAUSHALYA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

491. RFA - 1029 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HANS RAM AND OTHERS.

492. RFA - 3387 - 2018 MUNSHI (NOW DECEASED) THRU LRS AND OTHERS.

V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

493. RFA - 1039 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS.

494. RFA - 984 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. KAUSHALYA & OTHERS

495. RFA - 5492 - 2017 UMRAO AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

496. RFA - 1011 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UMRAO AND OTHERS.

497. RFA - 975 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUNIL KUMAR & OTHERS

498. RFA - 1022 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SITA RAM AND OTHERS.

499. RFA - 3463 - 2018 SHISH RAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

500. RFA - 978 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KARTAR SINGH & OTHERS

501. RFA - 1024 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MEHAR CHAND AND OTHERS.

502. RFA - 1012 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UMRAO AND OTHERS.

503. RFA - 985 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. KAUSHALYA AND OTHERS.

504. RFA - 1034 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UMRAO & OTHERS

505. RFA - 1041 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMPHAL AND OTHERS.

506. RFA - 2133 - 2018 KARTAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

507. RFA - 979 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS

508. RFA - 466 - 2018 HANUMAN V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

509. RFA - 996 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S UMRAO AND OTHERS.

510. RFA - 5556 - 2017 ROOP CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

511. RFA - 980 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROSHAN LAL & OTHERS

512. RFA - 993 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS.

513. RFA - 2129 - 2018 MATADIN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

514. RFA - 1037 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHRI CHAND AND OTHERS.

515. RFA - 1030 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RATI RAM AND OTHERS.

516. RFA - 1043 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS.

517. RFA - 1035 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS

518. RFA - 2124 - 2018 GIAN CHAND AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

519. RFA - 2146 - 2018 RATTI RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

520. RFA - 467 - 2018 JEET RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

521. RFA - 973 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ROOP CHAND & OTHERS

522. RFA - 2276 - 2018 KAUSHALYA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

523. RFA - 3694 - 2018 JODHA RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

524. RFA - 987 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SITA RAM AND OTHERS.

525. RFA - 346 - 2020 HUKAM SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

526. RFA - 2140 - 2018 TEK CHAND AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

527. RFA - 1025 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KISHAN AND OTHERS.

528. RFA - 986 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUMER AND OTHERS.

529. RFA - 995 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MANGE RAM AND OTHERS.

530. RFA - 1023 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS.

531. RFA - 977 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHISH RAM & OTHERS

532. RFA - 1487 - 2018 KISHORI LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

533. RFA - 981 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HARI RAM & OTHERS

534. RFA - 548 - 2018 RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

535. RFA - 549 - 2018 RAJU AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

536. RFA - 1222 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S MANGTU RAM & OTHERS.

537. RFA - 1226 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJA RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS.

538. RFA - 550 - 2018 GRAM PANCHAYAT JALIAWAS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

539. RFA - 552 - 2018 GINDORI AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

540. RFA - 1231 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GRAM PANCHAYAT JALIAWAS AND OTHERS.

541. RFA - 1234 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. BHAGWATI & OTHERS.

542. RFA - 1221 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHIB LAL AND OTHERS.

543. RFA - 1229 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAM PAL AND OTHERS.

544. RFA - 1223 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SHISH PAL & OTHERS.

545. RFA - 1218 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S PHOOL SINGH AND OTHERS.

546. RFA - 1230 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHAN SINGH AND OTHERS

547. RFA - 1228 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. MANA AND OTHERS.

548. RFA - 1217 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KUNDAN & OTHERS.

549. RFA - 1233 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DULI CHAND AND OTHERS.

550. RFA - 1227 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAJU AND OTHERS.

551. RFA - 254 - 2018 DHARAM PAL (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

552. RFA - 551 - 2018 BEGH RAJ V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

553. RFA - 1220 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. GINDORI AND OTHERS.

554. RFA - 1219 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BEGH RAJ AND OTHERS.

555. RFA - 1232 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LAL SINGH & OTHERS.

556. RFA - 1224 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM KUMAR & OTHERS.

557. RFA - 261 - 2018 RAJA RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

558. RFA - 1225 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S GUGAN RAM AND OTHERS.

559. RFA - 1729 - 2018 ANIL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

560. RFA - 2062 - 2018 DULI CHAND DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

561. RFA - 2138 - 2018 SMT. BHAGWATI AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

562. RFA - 1991 - 2018 SMT. MANA AND OTHERS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

563. RFA - 2145 - 2018 SHIB LAL @ SHIV LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

564. RFA - 709 - 2018 LAL SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

565. RFA - 1902 - 2018 GUGAN RAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS

566. RFA - 2131 - 2018 DHAN SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

567. RFA - 553 - 2018 PHOOL SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

568. RFA - 708 - 2018 KUNDAN AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

569. RFA - 1376 - 2018 SHISH PAL (DECEASED) THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS.

570. RFA - 1340 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SOM DUTT & OTHERS.

571. RFA - 1324 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SMT. SANTRA & OTHERS

572. RFA - 1332 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S ANIL & OTHERS

573. RFA - 879 - 2020 RAM PARSAD V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

574. RFA - 259 - 2018 HEM RAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS & OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

575. RFA - 1409 - 2019 RAMESHWAR (DECEASED) THRO LRS ETC V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

576. RFA - 260 - 2018 RAM NARAIN SINCE DECEASED THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

577. RFA - 861 - 2019 SOM DUTT AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

578. RFA - 1433 - 2019 RAM PAL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

579. RFA - 1334 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARMENDER & OTHERS

580. RFA - 1722 - 2018 DHARAMVIR AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

581. RFA - 1335 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DESH RAJ & OTHERS

582. RFA - 1721 - 2018 KHUSHI RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

583. RFA - 105 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAM PARSAD AND OTHERS

584. RFA - 1336 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM NARAIN & OTHERS

585. RFA - 1328 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HUKAM CHAND AND OTHERS

586. RFA - 1724 - 2018 RAMESH KUMAR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

587. RFA - 880 - 2020 RAJA RAM AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

588. RFA - 1333 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAMESH KUMAR & OTHERS

589. RFA - 1725 - 2018 DESH RAJ AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

590. RFA - 1339 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S OMPAL & OTHERS

591. RFA - 1326 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S HEM RAJ @ HAR CHAND AND OTHERS

592. RFA - 255 - 2018 RAM NARAIN SINCE DECEASED THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

593. RFA - 1329 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUDHIR KUMAR ADOPTED SON OF BHAWANI SINGH AND OTHERS

594. RFA - 1726 - 2018 KHAYALI RAM DECEASED THR HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

595. RFA - 1723 - 2018 SMT. SANTRA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

596. RFA - 1331 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S NAWAL @ NAWAL KISHORE AND OTHERS

597. RFA - 116 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAMESHWAR AND OTHERS

598. RFA - 1330 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SUKH RAM AND OTHERS

599. RFA - 258 - 2018 LALA RAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

600. RFA - 101 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAM PAL AND OTHERS

601. RFA - 1338 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KISHORI LAL & OTHERS

602. RFA - 1343 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S DHARAMVIR AND OTHERS

603. RFA - 1325 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KHUSHI RAM AND OTHERS

604. RFA - 1342 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S SOBHA RAM & OTHERS

605. RFA - 3691 - 2018 NAWAL @ NAWAL KISHORE AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

606. RFA - 4597 - 2018 SUKH RAM DECEASED THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

607. RFA - 3690 - 2018 SOBHA RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

608. RFA - 100 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S RAJA RAM AND OTHERS

609. RFA - 121 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S SATISH KUMAR AND OTHERS

610. RFA - 1323 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAKESH KUMAR & OTHERS

611. RFA - 1341 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S RAM NARAIN AND OTHERS

612. RFA - 1892 - 2018 RAKESH KUMAR & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

613. RFA - 3659 - 2018 SUDHIR KUMAR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

614. RFA - 98 - 2021 HSIIDC V/S GRAM PANCHAYAT KARNAWAS AND OTHERS

615. RFA - 3658 - 2018 HUKAM CHAND V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

616. RFA - 1327 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S LALA RAM & OTHERS

617. RFA - 1337 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S KHAYALI RAM & OTHERS

618. RFA - 3105 - 2019 GRAM PANCHAYAT, KARNAWAS, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT REWARI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

619. RFA - 1727 - 2018 DHARMENDER AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

620. RFA - 2795 - 2018 KISHORI LAL DECEASED THR LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

621. RFA - 2015 - 2021 RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

622. RFA - 2065 - 2021 SITAR SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR PHOOL PATI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

623. RFA - 2026 - 2021 HARPAL SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

624. RFA - 2032 - 2021 HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

625. RFA - 2017 - 2021 RAM SINGH DECEASED THROUGH LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

626. RFA - 2025 - 2021 JOGINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

627. RFA - 2020 - 2021 JOGINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

628. RFA - 2019 - 2021 RAJENDER SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

629. RFA - 2029 - 2021 AMAR KAUR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

630. RFA - 1102 - 2021 NATHU RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

631. RFA - 1474 - 2021 RAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

632. RFA - 2024 - 2021 JOGINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

633. RFA - 1473 - 2021 RAM PHOOL AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

634. RFA - 2034 - 2021 JOGINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

635. RFA - 2028 - 2021 RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

636. RFA - 2023 - 2021 RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

637. RFA - 2011 - 2021 OM PARKASH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

638. RFA - 1316 - 2021 SUBE SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

639. RFA - 1545 - 2021 GRAM PANCHAYAT SUTHANI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

640. RFA - 2012 - 2021 AMI LAL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

641. RFA - 2027 - 2021 SHRI RAM AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

642. RFA - 2066 - 2021 SITAR SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR PHOOLPATI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

643. RFA - 2022 - 2021 RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

644. RFA - 2021 - 2021 RAM SINGH DECEASED THROUGH LRS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

645. RFA - 465 - 2018 RAMJI LAL AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

646. RFA - 305 - 2020 ROOP CHAND THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

647. RFA - 1640 - 2018 HSIIDC V/S BALU RA AND OTHERS

648. RFA - 8492 - 2018 HAR LAL (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS