← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRFA/2250/2017disposed of

Devi Dayal v. State Of Haryana And Others

2017-06-02Mr. Justice Arun Palli2 pages

RFA-2250-2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA-2250-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 02, 2017 Devi Dayal ...Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Mahendra Singh Tewatia, Advocate, for the appellant.

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) CM-6027-CI-2017:

For the reasons set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 1892 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. CM-6028-CI-2017:

This is an application for condonation of delay of 72 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

Notice of the application.

Ms. Safia Gupta, AAG, Haryana, present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Pritam S. Saini, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. For the reasons set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 72 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. CM-6030-CI-2017:

Allowed as prayed for.

Prashant Kapoor 2017.06.02 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

RFA-2250-2017 (O&M) CM-6029-CI-2017 and RFA-2250-2017:

All what has been urged by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant is that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment, dated 28.03.2016, rendered by this Court in RFA No. 2322 of 2011, titled "Usha Rani and others v. State of haryana and others", and other connected cases, vide which in the appeals arising out of the same acquisition, this Court had enhanced the compensation awarded to the landowners to Rs. 48,57,000/- per acre.

The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents.

For, the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Usha Rani's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the said decision.

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE June 02, 2017 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2017.06.02 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document