Om Parkash & ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.2657 of 2017(O&M) Date of decision: 23.08.2022 Om Parkash deceased through his Lrs. And others ..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jagtar Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate, Mr. Jatin Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Anil K. Rana, Advocate, Mr. Nafees Ahmed, Advocate, Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate, Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Samar Ahluwalia, Advocate, Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate, Mr. Virender Rana, Advocate, Mr. Trishu Kanwar, Advocate and Ms. Sunita Nambiar, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No. 6448-CI of 2017 For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the application for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased late Sh. Om Parkash [appellant], is allowed, subject to all the just exceptions.

CM stands disposed of.

Main case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.2352 of 2017 titled as Smt. Krishna Jindal vs. State of Haryana and ors. NEELAM 2022.09.23 01:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RFA No.2657 of 2017(O&M) -2All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

23.08.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) neelam JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No NEELAM 2022.09.23 01:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document