Dial Sarup v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam (Hvpn) And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-26905-2021 (O&M) Date of decision:- 03.02.2022 Dial Sarup

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited (HVPNL), Panchkula and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Akshit Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gautam Goyal, Advocate, for the respondents.

(The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual Court) * * * * RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same. Prayer made is allowed.

Dismissed as withdrawn being not pressed.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the validity of the provisions contained in Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as Sections 10 and 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 which have been challenged in the writ petition and are kept open. (RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE 03.02.2022 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2022.02.04 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document