Darshan Singh v. Attu @ Atma Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.5011 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.31.01.2019 Darshan Singh ...Appellant Vs Attu @ Atma Singh

...Respondent

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Viney Puri, Advocate for Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the appellant.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that compliance of impleadment of legal representatives of appellant could not be done, as nobody has come forward. Costs of `7000/- has also not been paid.

It appears that legal representatives of deceasedappellant are not interested in pursuing the present appeal, much less, reconciled with the ground realities.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 31, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.02.01 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document