Harnek Singh v. Baljit Kaur
! " #$% &' ()*+,-*.% /-*0+1+0+(/+1!$%)2.%%-/3+.(3%+-)/ 44+33(*$ 5+)/2/ (36-$7(2) +/4*1+*$ " 89 :
:& )(3! ;
'#<;;
!! " # $ % " # (-*44+(3 & & '#() () !(*+& , -# '# *. (* !(*/ & 0 -#12 , 3 & & 4 2 # % % /5!)
-2- # 6 6 "
" % ,& 7 % % # % 42 # 4% % "6 %# 4% % & % (+ (!
!(*!
% 8& && % 42 # 9 % 8 %' '#*.
(* !(*/ # '#% &, -# % & & % 0 4 # # & # # # & &% % & 0#
: %& & & # 8 & 0; < * & & # & # % & < * & % 0 # ; < *
-3- # & 0 : & # & & 0 &% 9 % % % # & 0 &% # ; & % # %% & 0 &% # & #& 4 & 4 # 0 & # & 9 & # # % &
% # !((.
% 6 # ,& 7 6 "
" # 0 &% # ##& 6 ' & 0 % % # # 9 !((=% & 6& 42 #8
-4- & % 2 % & 6 & 42 # % > # ;% & ## # 4% # 6 % % #& 08 % # % % 8 # #& 0&% & #% # $ & & & # %& % %6 & < & #% # # % & % # #%& & # ,& 7&& 0%%
-5- % ? # #%& "6 &
6 %
8 % 6 , 2 2 # >!
4%% % &6 , 2 # 0 %# # %# #& & &% & %& & % %
In view of the above, finding no merit in the present appeal, the same is dismissed. # 13
#$% &'
:!