Pritam Singh @ Preeta v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No.43485 of 2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.43485 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.01.2020 Pritam Singh @ Preeta

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:- None for the petitioner.

Mr. Jagmohan Singh Ghumman, DAG, Punjab.

***** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J .(Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even on 3 calls.

Notice of motion was issued on 15.10.2019 after recording incriminating facts. On 28.05.2019, petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court. The petitioner could not explain the delay of more than 4 months in filing the petition for anticipatory bail. The indulgence was granted by this Court subject to deposit of Rs.5000/- as cost(s) with District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana within two weeks.

As per office report, the notice could not be issued for GEETA RANI 2020.01.22 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.43485 of 2019 (O&M) -2want of process fee.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Baljeet Singh states that amount of cost(s) has not been deposited with DLSA, Ludhiana.

Since, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no alternative, except to dismiss this petition for non prosecution.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

21.01.2020 ( Raj Mohan Singh ) geeta Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2020.01.22 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document