Suman Rani v. Rakesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.204 Date of Decision: 14.02.2025 ....Applicant
Versus
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
!
" #$
%&
% $ $) ( (
* + , - $ ( %
$ - % ( $%-
"." " /- &$ (
%
$
0
%(
%&
(
$ ('( (
$
$
% ."
.#& &
&
(
$
$ ( . " " #$% % ( On account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant has filed the complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, as well as the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., which are pending in the Courts at Karnal. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is unemployed and is not having any source of earning. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 120 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Courts at Rohtak.
In view of the aforesaid submissions and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, when the respondent has not come forth to resist the transfer application, the transfer application is allowed and
!
" #$
%&
% $ ( '(&
$ ) $ (
* + 2 %
%& $) $
3$+
0 3$+ $ $+ /- $ % $+ $ (
(
&
(ARCHANA PURI) 14.02.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No