Pritam Singh v. M.C., Yamuna Nagar & ANR

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 4130 of 2015 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 06. 03. 2020 Pr i t am Si ngh .... . Pet i t i oner ver sus Muni ci pal Cor por at i on, Yamuna Nagar and anot her . . . . . Respondent s CORAM: - HON' BLE MRS. JUSTI CE ALKA SARI N Pr esent :

Ms. Aashna Gi l l , Advocat e f or Mr . Aman Pal , Advocat e f or t he appel l ant Mr . Raj esh K. Sheor an, Advocat e f or t he r espondent s . .

ALKA SARI N: ( Or al ) The pr esent sui t was f or per manent i nj unct i on r est r ai ni ng t he def endant - r espondent s f r om di ggi ng a sewer age pi pe t hr ough t he sui t pr oper t y. Bot h t he Cour t s bel ow have di smi ssed t he sui t of t he pl ai nt i f f - appel l ant . Agai nst t he j udgment s and decr ees passed by bot h t he Cour t s bel ow, t he pr esent appeal has been pr ef er r ed. Si nce t her e was no st ay gr ant ed i n t he pr esent appeal , l ear ned counsel f or t he appel l ant submi t s t hat dur i ng t he i nt er r egnum per i od t he sewer age pi pe has al r eady been l ai d. I n vi ew t her eof , t he appeal i s di smi ssed as havi ng been r ender ed i nf r uct uous. ( ALKA SARI N) JUDGE

06. 03. 2020 par kash NOTE:

Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO PARKASH CHAND 2020.03.06 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document