Amrik Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
!" # $%&%!'( )) *+%, -%'./ ))) % %!' + 0 +&1& - !" 1'2 '# '! / + ))) &4!'# ' & ( 56 ) - - + & ' (
- 7 )
+ 8
! "# #$ % &
& '
( % % )*+ !, # -# # $ .
$#, $#$ ,/ ," * &0 /- 1 2*034
#! "!"1 2 34 & 5 & && #
)*+14( (&6
( % & % #,
$ .# # $#- $#!
$#, $#$ ,#.
! - ,/ ,"*0 7 &% & % & ((
,
# # 1 86$4 &
-
# # 1 8 6,4 % & 0 &(
( & (
0+66#",# 6# # 0+66#..#$6# # )*+14 +14 7
&% % )*+-- # ,# # 9$ # $,
,/
," *0 ( #6& & & 5 &1 86!4 07 &% % & : & # (&&
. !# ##1 86.4 )*+$$ # $# ## $ .
$,*0 #! ( & 5 &1 86/4 & % * ( % (&&
! "# #$ $ ; & & 0 &(&& %&& %
%6< % )*+ $$(& &% & )*+-- % 7 ( )*+14(
(% )*+$$ ( & && &%
)*+( 7 &* % )*+ $$+& & % ' 5= 0
+ = 0 !"#
$% & '
" " ( )*+)&&% ( & &
& & & % & =3 &0 )*+$$ 4.
Per contra, learned State Counsel submits that the learned trial Court has correctly cancelled the bail of the petitioner as he did not abide by the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The FIR bearing no. 33 was registered against the petitioner because, on 20.03.2022, using armed weapons, he and his accomplices attempted to commit murder of respondent No.2. As such, no interference by this Court is merited. 5.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the record of the case, it transpires that the petitioner was granted bail in the case stemming from FIR No. 154 vide order ,
# # 1 86$4
( ( & -
# # 1 8 6,4 =( & % %
& & % < #( )*+$$ & && 7 (&& => (
)*+$$ ( & % & -
% & && 7
& & ( & * 0 &<&% & % % &&%
% =( && (& & & %& % &
(
< %>&% & & 0 && .
( & (
& && % =3 &0 ("
!, &-- &! +- &&(?6
) && ' : =3 &0
./0
!1 *! -
< ' 5 &&(?
!
" #
$
%
& '#
( ' #
'
) '
* '
+ '
, ' -
/ * ( 0
( % 8
( % &= & &%( &( & &<& ( (
& 0 &( & "
&% ! "# #$ % &
& ' %&
&& & 14 % && &
- )) ./ @ < 9
?
A9 @ & ?
A9