Ashok Kumar v. State Of Haryana
!"#" $% #& '()* +
"
" $ + , +#)# -
+.
$
#/ $0 $
11 % 23 - 3 -
+ # $ %
3 -45 36
!"#$%& '(
)")*()(+
#
' , -
--
!(!!(..)/%#
! %#10
!)*!(/%#
2
&44 "/+!4()(+
-
- ((++()(+
0
-
-
6
8
-
0
-
$%&
-
$%& :
-
0
0
0
; 9
-
$%&
$%&
;- 1
<-2
0 ; ;- 0
-
;
%
- 0
-
--
-
-
0
-
!"
# :
- %
0
-
0
:
8
: = #4+) 0
-
9>#
'
+!++()(+#-<-
0
0
: 0
-
$%&
#- <- 0
-
:
Notice of motion is issued to the respondent.
'
?#0
9
0
&
Mr. Gupta points to the earlier part of the very same inquiry report, to submit that Parmod Kumar had been stated to be innocent not just by one of the persons interrogated, i.e. his brother Brijpal (son of present petitioner), with other persons also having made similar statements qua Parmod Kumar, but with none having exonerated the petitioner.
Upon specific query to learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether in the said inquiry report the petitioner has also been named to be an innocent person by any of the persons interrogated/examined, he fairly submits that atleast as per the said report there is no such statement. He submits that however a co-accused of the petitioner, i.e. Jasmer Singh, has been admitted to bail by this Court on 09.12.2021, on medical grounds and the petitioner may also be admitted to anticipatory bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the complainant and having seen the fact that this Court had already dismissed the petition earlier filed by the petitioner, with there being no change of circumstance in the matter qua the petitioner himself, I would see no reason to admit the petitioner to such bail. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.
5 3 -6 @
A A' @
&
A'