State Of Punjab & ORS v. Ram Singh Driver
!
!
"
#
$
%
&' &( '&!)
*
+ , -
'. &/ '&!)
,
0
1 %
&! !' '&&&
0
'
0
2
0
%
'&&!
'&&3
"
#
%
'. &/ '&!)
4
&' &( '&!) 0
0
$
%
2
')
0 5 6 0
%%
) "
2
%
0
*
+ , -
0 2 ,
7 0
*#
!8/(2/.
'&&&2&!
0
0
%
'&&!2&'
'&&'2&3
7
9 +- "
%
% !88'
3& !' '&!!9 +- 1
%
3/
% 9 ( :
;
%
<
2
7
%
2 .
"
7
, #
,
= '
% 0 &' &3 !8/) >
* #
%
% % ,
%
%
>
3! &( '&&/
?
!3 !! '&&8 %
2
!883
0
2
'&&!
% 7
, !8/(
!8/)
"
2
%
02
!88'
'&&&
'&&/
')
%
'&&!
'&&3
< 7
%%
%
"#$%#$&"#' "
2 $
%
,
&' &3 !8/)
% 0
$
!&
'&
&. !' '&&&
!8 &( '&&3
2<
%
!& "
%
2
*
%
0
7 0
!!
"
$
*#
!8/(2/.
'&&'2&3
*#
@
@
0
%
2
0
% =
!& &! '&&&
2
0
%
!. &8 '&&/ !'
%
#
!3
%
/& **
!3 !! '&&8
$
7
!883
'&&!
!) 1
bona fide
% 7
, !8/( 0
%
!8/)
!( 1
$
0 %
%
, #
&' &3 !8/)
!8/(
7
0
2
1
$
0
!&
'&
%% &. !' '&&&
!8 &( '&&3
2<
7
0
&. !' '&&&
!8 &( '&&3 1
%
%
7
%
%
$
1
0
%%
% 7
*#
%
Audi Alteran Partem %
$
$
!?
>
( &')*''&"#' !/
0 <
%
2 +-
% +-
*#
!8/(2/.
'&&&2&!
<
*#
+-
3/
!8 0
0
0
<
%
%
%
$
> 0
0 % <
2
!88' '&&&
'&&/ 1
%
$
2
!3 !! '&&8
,
%$
1
<
0
*# 0
@ @
7 0
0
%
% % %
%
%
+
1
0
%
$
% %
7
#
%
1
0
$
%
!88' '&&&
'&&/
%
,
%
!3 !! '&&8
'& "
%
< '& , % '&!!
0
> * 0
% !8.3
<
$
'!
A =
0
2
< = !
0
3/
''
B <
%
0
%
0
%
3/
, '3 %
3
%
$
%%
> @ ;
0
2 "39.In the present case, we are developing the principles of natural justice by holding that fairness and transparency in public administration requires that all entries (whether poor, fair, average, good or very good) in the Annual Confidential Report of a public servant, whether in civil, judicial, police or any other State service (except the military), must be communicated to him within a reasonable period so that he can make a representation for its upgradation. This in our opinion is the correct legal position even though there may be no Rule/G.O. requiring communication of the entry, or even if there is a Rule/G.O. prohibiting it, because the principle of non,arbitrariness in State action as envisaged by Article 14 of the Constitution in our opinion requires such communication. Article 14 will override all rules or government orders.
40. We further hold that when the entry is communicated to him the public servant should have a right to make a representation against the entry to the concerned authority, and the concerned authority must decide the representation in a fair manner and within a reasonable period. We also hold that the representation must be decided by an authority higher than the one who gave the entry, otherwise the likelihood is that the representation will be summarily rejected without adequate consideration as it would be an appeal from Caesar to Caesar. All this would be conducive to fairness and transparency in public administration, and would result in fairness to public servants. The State must be a model employer, and must act fairly towards its employees. Only then would good governance be possible.
-
45. In our opinion, non,communication of entries in the Annual Confidential Report of a public servant, whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than the military), certainly has civil consequences because it may affect his chances for promotion or get other benefits (as already discussed above). Hence, such non,communication would be arbitrary, and as such violative of Article 14 of the Constitution." ')
4
%
;
!
"#$ %"
0
2 "In our opinion, the view taken in Dev Dutt that every entry in ACR of a public servant must be communicated to him/her within a reasonable period is legally sound and helps in achieving threefold objectives. First, the communication of every entry in the ACR to a public servant helps him/her to work harder and achieve more that helps him in improving his work and give better results. Second and equally important, on being made aware of the entry in the ACR, the public servant may feel dissatisfied with the same. Communication of the entry enables him/her to make representation for upgradation of the remarks entered in the ACR. Third, communication of every entry in the ACR brings transparency in recording the remarks relating to a public servant and the system becomes more conforming to the principles of natural justice. We, accordingly, hold that every entry in ACR - poor, fair, average, good or very good - must be communicated to him/her within a reasonable period." '( 1
%
#
!8/(2/.
'&&'2&3
'&&.2&? 0
0
% 7
6
%%
'.
>
%
#
%
%%
%
%
2 +- *#
7 0
7
%
%
+- 1
%% *#
0
;
% 7
% 7
<
*#
+- 1
7
%
%
%
'?
D
0
0
%%
$
'/ > #
%
%
&' &( '&!)
*
+ , -
'. &/ '&!)
,
'8
+-
.
Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No