Sajan Kumar And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRWP-10344-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10344-2022 DATE OF DECISION:01.11.2022 SAJAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present:
None for the petitioners.
**** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) Lawyers have abstained from work today.
The present petition has been filed seeking protection of life and liberty of the petitioners by contending that both of them having attained the age of majority, have married each other against the wishes of their respective family members respondent Nos.4 to 6 and to seek appropriate protection from the authorities. They submitted a representation dated 27.10.2022 (Annexure P-7) in this regard to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, but are still apprehensive about their security in view of the apparent inaction and alleged clout of their family members-respondents. Notice of motion.
Both of them do appear to have crossed the age of majority as seen from the copies of documents filed and have married each other, in support of which, Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-5) and Marriage Photographs (Annexure P-6), have been placed on record. MAMTA 2022.11.02 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10344-2022 For the aforesaid reasons, this appears to be a fit case for this Court to invoke the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and in view of the mandate contained in Article 21 of the Constitution of India to protect the citizen's right to life and liberty. Thus, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is directed to consider the representation dated 27.10.2022 (Annexure P-7) and take appropriate steps to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners.
It is nevertheless clarified that this order is issued only on the premise that the petitioners have crossed the age of majority as seen from the documents placed on record being Aadhar Card of petitioner no.1 as Annexures P-1 and Matriculation Certificate of petitioner no.2 as Annexure P-2. This would not ipso facto amount to granting any seal of approval on the legality of their marriage which essentially would come in the domain of the concerned Matrimonial Courts. Further, they would not be entitled for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings, if otherwise, found to be involved in commission of any cognizable offence(s).
The petition is disposed of with the above direction. 01.11.2022 (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) mamta JUDGE
MAMTA 2022.11.02 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document