High Court of Punjab and HaryanaIOIN/1714/2013disposed of

Satnam Singh And Ar v. Surinder Kumar Jagota And ORS

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1714 of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.02.2017 Satnam Singh and another ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Surinder Kumar Jagota and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. R.K. Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioners.

None for the respondents.

G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral) Counsel submits that respondents no. 2 and 3 are no longer in possession of the premises in question and respondent no. 1 has given a statement before the Rent Controller that he would vacate the premises on or before 20.08.2017 and, therefore, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and he does not wish to press the same. Ordered accordingly.

16.02.2017 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Shivani Gupta 2017.02.17 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document