Paras Ram v. State Of Haryana And ORS
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Reserved On: 03.04.2025 Pronounced On: 07.04.2025 Paras Ram ... Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present:
Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the appellant(s) (RFA-3216-2018).
Dr. Amol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shiv K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant(s) (In RFA-535-2019).
Mr. S.K.Jain, Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Akshay Jain, Mr. Gunjeet Brar and Mr. Sukhbir Brar, Advocates for the appellant(s) (In RFA-1336-2018, RFA-3872-2018 to RFA-3891-2018, RFA-3894-2018 to RFA-3906-2018, RFA-12-2020 and RFA-16-2020).
Ms. Maanvi Arora, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants (In RFA-4044-2018 to RFA-4047-2018) and for the respondent(s) (In RFA-997-2019, RFA-1123-2019, and RFA-1220-2019).
Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate for the appellant(s) (In RFA-3432-2018 to RFA-3434-2018). Ms. Safia Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Anil Kshetarpal, J.
1.
Brief Facts of the Case 1.1 With the consent of the learned counsel representing the parties,
a batch of 170 appeals (details whereof are given at the foot of the judgment) shall stand disposed of by this judgment.
1.2 This Court has been called upon to assess the market value of the acquired land on 21.05.2010 under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1894 Act"). 1.3 The relevant and necessary details of the acquisition are as under:- S.No.
Date Particulars 1.
21.05.2010 Notification under Sections 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1894 Act") was issued proposing to acquire the land for development of the residential, commercial, sector road, green belt, Sector 10, Dabwali.
2.
20.05.2011 Declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act was issued.
3.
15.05.2013 The Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as "the LAC") offered to pay ₹60,00,000/- per acre for the land falling on the National Highway upto the depth of 2 acres and ₹40,00,000/- per acre for all other kinds of land. ₹34,82,248/- was awarded for structures/buildings and tube-wells, whereas ₹9,93,992/- was awarded for trees.
4.
16.03.2018 and 06.10.2018 The Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as "the RC") assessed the market value of the acquired land at the uniform rate of ₹1,393/- per square yard i.e. ₹67,42,120/- per acre.
1.4 These cross-appeals have been filed by the landowners as well as the State of Haryana.
1.5 The landowners claim that the acquired land adjoining Dabwali City and has significant potential for being used for commercial purpose particularly the area abutting the national highway. Consequently, the market value of the land adjoining the national highway is not less than ₹10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crore) per acre. It is also claimed that there are showrooms, schools, shops, residential colonies, namely Rajiv Colony,
Gugamari Colony, Indira Nagar, Chauhan Nagar, Dhaliwal Nagar, Office & the residential colony of Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Petrol Pump, government offices are also located in the said vicinity. 1.6 Per contra, the State of Haryana claims that as per classification, the LAC has already awarded the proper and reasonable compensation and hence, there is no scope for enhancement. 2.
Evidence Adduced 2.1 In fact, the RC decided the cases in two different batches. The first batch was decided on 16.03.2018. In the oral evidence, the landowners examined the following witnesses:- Sr.
No.
Witness Number Name of the Witness 1.
PW. 1/PW.9 Hari Parkash, Architect 2.
PW. 2 Hardeep Kaur 3.
PW. 3 Janak Raj 4.
PW. 4 Pala Ram, ALM, DHBVNL Dabwali 5.
PW. 5 Sukhdev Singh 6.
PW. 6 Kitab Singh, JE, Office of Town Planner, Sirsa 7.
PW. 7 Jagroop Singh 8.
PW. 8 Amritpal Singh 9.
PW. 9 Sukhbir Singh 10.
PW. 10 Sonika Rani 11.
PW. 11 Jagseer Singh 12.
PW. 12 Darshan Kumar 13.
PW. 13 Jagseer Singh 14.
PW. 14 Tajinder Singh 15.
PW. 15 Balkaran Singh 16.
PW. 16 Harcharan Singh 17.
PW. 17 Girdhari Lal 18.
PW. 18 Chhinder Singh 19.
PW. 19 Parveen Rani 20.
PW. 20 Ashwani Kumar 21.
PW. 21 Bhagwant Singh
Sr.
No.
Witness Number Name of the Witness 22.
PW. 22 Sukhdev Singh 23.
PW. 23 Randhir Singh 24.
PW. 24 Bhim Sain 25.
PW. 25 Narender Kumar, Lambardar 26.
PW. 26 Hari Ram, RC of the office of Sub Registrar, Dabwali 27.
PW. 27 Tara Chand Sharma, Advocate 28.
PW. 29 Vikas Singla 2.2 In documentary evidence, the landowners have also produced the following documents:
Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 1.
Ex.P1 Copy of Sizra of area of Mandi Dabwali 2.
Ex.D1 Letter no.471 dated 13.3.2014 regarding renewal of License of Architect of the year 3.
Ex.R1 Photo copy of Award No. 2 dated 15.5.2013 4.
Ex.PW.4/A & Ex.PW.4/B Photo copies of list of consumers of DHBVNL 5.
Ex.PW.4/C to Ex.PW.4/F Electricity bills.
6.
Ex.PW.6/A & Ex.PW.6/B Attested copies of Aks Sizra of village Dabwali 7.
Ex.PW.7/D Certified copy of mutation no. 8541 of village Dabwali.
8.
Ex.PW.9/1 to Ex.PW.9/3 Photographs 9.
Ex.PW.9/4 Certified copy of jamababdi for the years 2007-2008 10.
Ex.PW.9/5 Valuation report.
11.
Ex.PW.9/6 Copy of Site plan 12.
Ex.PW.9/7 Valuation report.
13.
Ex.PW.9/8 site plan 14.
Ex.PW.9/9 Photo copy of jamabandi for the years 201215. Ex.PW.9/10 Evaluation report of valuation of immovable property.
16.
Ex.PW.9/11 Photographs 17.
Ex.PW.9/12 Site plan 18.
Ex.PW.9/13 Certified copy of jamabandi for the years
Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 2012-2013 19.
Ex.PW.9/14 Valuation report.
20.
Ex.PW.9/15 Site plan 21.
Ex.PW.9/16 Photo copy of jamabandi for the years 201222. Ex.PW.9/17 to Ex.PW.9/19 Photographs 23.
Ex.PW.9/20 Valuation report.
24.
Ex.PW.9/21 Site plan 25.
Ex.PW.13/D Photo copy of Award dated 11.4.2009 26.
Ex.PW.15/B Copy of khasra girdawari of village Dabwali for the years 2010 27.
Ex.PW.18/1 Photo copy of Mulkhtiar -a-aam executed by Smt. Pushpa Devi 28.
Ex.PW.18/2 Photo copy of Mulkhtiar-a-aam of Usha Rani 29.
Ex.PW.18/3 Photo copy of Mukhtiara nama executed by Pardeep Kumar.
30.
Ex.PW.18/8 to Ex.PW/18/10 Photo copy of collector rate 31.
Ex.PW.18/11 Photo copies of collector rate 32.
Ex.PW.18/12 Aks Sizra 33.
Ex.P1 & Ex.P2 Photo copy of electricity bill 34.
Ex.P2 to Ex.P12 Form J issued by M/s Surajmal Suresh Kumar 35.
Ex.P 13 Photo copy of application ofobjection raised against notification 36.
Ex.P 14 Postal receipt.
37.
Ex.P 15 Photo copy of application for compensation mode by Vidhya Devi 38.
Ex.P16 Certified copy of Aks Sizra 39.
Ex.PW.26/A Photo copy of Will executed by Vidhay Devi 40.
Ex.PW.27/A Entries of register maintained by deed wrioter 41.
Ex.PX Certified copy of Judgment dated 12.4.2016 passed by the Hon'ble High Court.
42.
Ex.PW.29/B Death Certificate 43.
Ex.PW.29/C PAN Card.
44.
Ex.PW.29/D Voter card and PAN card of Vidhay Devi 45.
Ex.PW.29/E to Ex.PW.29/H Photographs 46.
Ex.PW.29/X Photo copy of Mark sheet of Vikas Singla 47.
Ex.PW.29/Y Pass Certificate 48.
Ex.PW.29/Z Photo copy of statement of marks.
49.
Ex.PA1 & Ex.PA/2 Photo copy of Aks Sizra
Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 50.
Ex.PA3 Photostat copy of akash sizra of village Dabwali, 51.
Ex.PA4 Certified copy of jamabandi for the years 2012-2013 52.
Ex.PA5 and Ex.PA6 Photo copy Gaz.of office of the Town Planner 53.
Ex.PA7 Photo copy of Roznamcha of village Dabwali 54.
Ex.PA8 Photo copy of award No. 2 dated 15.5.2013 55.
Ex.PA9 to Ex.PA12 Postal receipt.
56.
Ex.PA13 Objection u/s 5 A 57.
Ex.PA14 Valuation report.
58.
Ex.PA15 to Ex.PA17 Corbon copy of receipot issued by office of M.C. Dabwali 59.
Ex.PA18 Photo copy of Aks Sizra 60.
Ex.PA19 to Ex.PA22 Photographs 61.
Ex.PA23 Certified copy of Aks Sizra 62.
Ex.PA24 Photostat copy of jamabandi for the years 2012-2013 63.
Ex.PA25 Photo copy of Aks Sizra 64.
Ex.PA26 Certified copy of jamabandi for the years 2007-2008 65.
Ex.PA27 Certified copy of mutation no. 14286 66.
Ex.PA28 Certified copy of Aks sizra 67.
Ex.PA29 Photo copy of sale deed no.4223 dt.
13.11.2007 68.
Ex.PA30 to Ex.PA33 Postal receipts 69.
Ex.PA34 Copy of representation u/s 48 of the LA 2.3 On the other hand, the State of Haryana examined RW.1 Subhash Chander, Patwari, in the oral evidence and in the documentary evidence, the following documents were produced:- Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 1.
Ex.R1 Authority Letter 2.
Ex.R2 Application No. 801 dated 13.04.2017 3.
Ex.R14 Photocopy of notification No. 518 of 2010 4.
Ex.R15 Photocopy of Award No. 2 dated 15.05.2013 5.
Ex.R16 Photocopy of Aks Sizra 2.4 In rebuttal evidence, the landowners produced the following
documents:- Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 1.
Ex.PA35 Aks Shizra 2.
Ex.PA36 Notification No. 484 dated 21.05.2010 3.
Ex.PA37 Photocopy of Notification No. 518 dated 20.05.2011 4.
Ex.PA38 Consumer List 5.
Ex.PA39 Photo copy of Award No. 2 dated 15.05.2013 2.5 In batch-II, the RC decided the cases on 06.10.2018. The landowners apart from examining PW.1 Manjit Singh, produced the following documents:
Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 1.
Ex.P1 Certified copy of award dated 15.05.2013 2.
Ex.P2 Certified copy of jamabandi for the year 20073. Ex.P3 Certified copy of award dated 16.03.2018 4.
Ex.P8 Certified coy of orders of Hon'ble High Court 5.
Ex.P9 Notification 6.
Ex.P10 Notification 7.
Ex.P11 Letter of M.C. Dabwali 8.
Ex.P12 Certified copy of award No. 2 dated 15.05.2013 9.
Ex.P13 Certified copy of statement of Ahari Parkash 10.
Ex.P14 Aks Sizra 11.
Ex.P15 Jamabandi for the years 2012-2013 12.
Ex.P16 Jamabandi for the years 2007-2008 13.
Ex.P17 Jamabandi for the years 2007-2008 2.6 On the other hand, the State of Haryana has not led any oral evidence, but produced the following documents:- Sr. No.
Exhibit Number Description of the document 1.
Ex.R1 Notification 2.
Ex.R2 Notification 3.
Ex.R3 Copy of award No. 2 dated 15.05.2013 4.
Ex.R4 Photocopy of award dated 16.03.2018
3.
Reasons Recorded by the RC 3.1 The RC has excluded the sale deeds produced by the landowners as well as the State of Haryana from consideration. In fact, the landowners have substantially relied upon the sale deed No. 3749 dated 04.10.2007 (Ex.PW.18/4) with respect to the land measuring 24 kanals 4 marlas sold @ ₹2,17,51,767/- per acre to Amazon Enterprises for ₹6,97,99,096/-. The RC has ignored this sale instance on the ground that the property has been purchased by a colonizer, hence, it cannot be relied upon. The RC, while relying upon the market value assessed by the High Court in Ram Kanwar and Others v. State of Haryana (Ex.PX) for acquisition of the land as on 23.07.1997 @ ₹893/- per square yard, proceeded to calculate increase @ 12% per annum for a period of 13 years, assessed the market value @ ₹67,42,120/- per acre.
4.
Arguments putforth by the learned counsel representing the parties 4.1 Heard the learned counsel representing the parties, at length and with their able assistance, perused the paper-book. 4.2 It would be noted here that the learned counsel representing the landowners have not made any submissions with regard to the amount assessed by the RC for the buildings/structures, tube-wells or trees. 4.3 Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate, the learned counsel representing the appellants/landowners has submitted that the sale instance No. 3749, dated 04.10.2007 (Ex.PW.18/4) is out of the acquired land. He submits that without any basis, this sale instance has been ignored. While referring to the sale instance Nos. 3233, 3388 and 3415, he submits that the price of the
land was not less than ₹6,000/- per square yard i.e. nearly ₹3,00,00,000/- (Rupees Three Crore) per acre. The other counsels have also reiterated Mr. Jain's submissions.
4.4 Per contra, the learned counsel representing the respondents, while referring to the sale instances produced by the State, submits that the RC has erred in assessing the market value at a uniform rate of ₹1,393/- per square yard.
5.
Discussion & Analysis 5.1 This Court has analyzed, evaluated and considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel representing the parties. 5.2 Ex.R16 is the layout plan produced by the State. Perusal of the notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act proves that out of the revenue estate of old Dabwali, the land was acquired from rectangle No. 33, 35, 36, 37, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 78, whereas in New Dabwali revenue estate, the land was acquired from rectangle No. 3, 5, 6, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24. The word "rectangle" in terms of the unit of agricultural land denotes a rectangular plot of 25 acres (5x5 acres).
Perusal of the layout plans proves that approximately 10 acres of the acquired land is located on the national highway from Mandi Dabwali to Sirsa whereas the remaining acquired land is located at a depth away from the highway. It would be noted here that the land comprised in khasra No. 6 (min), 13(min), 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24 and 25 out of rectangle No. 35 has been acquired. The sale deed No. 3749 dated 04.10.2007 is with respect to the land comprised in rectangle No. 36 khasra No. 14/1/2, 14/2/2, 15, 16, 17, 24/2 and 25. Similarly, the sale instance No. 3388 dated 12.09.
56.86 square yards comprised in rectangle No. 36 khasra No. 7/1, 7/2 and 14/1. The sale instance No. 3415, dated 13.09.2007 is with respect to the plot measuring 60 square yards plot comprised in rectangle No. 36 khasra No. 7/1, 7/2 and 14/1. All three sale instances are with respect to the acquired land. Perusal of the layout plan proves that these three parcels of land are located on the national highway. The sale deed No. 898 dated 14.05.2010 (Ex.R3) produced by the State is with respect to the plot comprised in rectangle No. 35 khasra No. 4. Some part of rectangle No. 35 has also been acquired. Hence, this plot was very close to the acquired land. Similarly, the sale deed No. 5328, dated 02.03.2010 is with respect to the land comprised in rectangle No. 34 khasra No. 25 and rectangle No. 35 khasra No. 19/2 and 21.
The plot is also close to the acquired land because land comprised in khasra No. 18 out of rectangle No. 35 has been acquired. Similarly, the sale deed No. 2843, dated 08.10.2009 (Ex.R7) pertains to the land comprising in rectangle No. 34 khasra No. 17/2, 18 and 24. Similar is the position of the sale deed No. 4143 dated 07.10.2010 which is comprised in khasra No. 16 out of rectangle No. 34. Thus, it is evident that the price of the strip of land upto the depth of 2 acres on the national highway was much higher when compared with the price of the acquired land beyond the depth of 2 acres from National Highway. Even as per the layout plan (Ex.PW.
6/B) of Sector 10, Dabwali, proves that the government also utilized the front of the acquired land located on the national highway for commercial purpose, namely Commercial-cum-Shopping Complex, Fruits & Vegetables Market, Showrooms, Banquet Hall etc., whereas the property on the rear from National Highway has been utilized for the residential purpose.
Consequently, the RC erred in assessing the market value of the acquired land uniformly.
5.3 It would be noted here that there is no evidence produced by the State to prove that the sale deed No. 3749 was artificially inflated or it was sold at excessive price. In the absence thereof, the landowners of a belt of 2 acres depth on the national highway are entitled to the price of commercial property. This price is corroborated by the sale instances No. 3388 and 3415, whereas the price of the land on the rear far away from National Highway is corroborated by the sale instance No. 898 (14.05.2010), 5328 (02.03.2010), 2843 (08.10.2009) and 4143 (07.01.2010). Hence, the RC erred in uniformly assessing the market value of the acquired land which is a huge chunk of the land measuring 197.56 acres. In the absence of evidence to prove that the land located beyond the depth of 2 acres was being utilized for commercial purpose, it was not appropriate for the RC to deprive the landowners of the belt of 2 acres depth abutting the national highway from the price of commercial property.
5.4 The sale deed No. 3749 is with respect to the land more than 3 acres (14641 square yards). This is considered as the base value for assessing the market value of strip of acquired land upto the depth of 2 acres from the national highway. This sale instance is of 04.10.2007 whereas the market value is to be determined on 21.05.2010. There is a difference of two years and eight months. The landowners shall be entitled to addition of 12% per annum on ₹2,17,51,767/-, the base value, which is equivalent to/calculated @ which is equivalent to/calculated at ₹2,87,12,333/- per acre. 5.5 The RC has criticized the LAC's award on the ground that
belting system used by the LAC while making an award is inappropriate. The RC has relied upon the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Udho Dass v. State of Haryana (2010) 2 SCC 51 while setting aside the award of the LAC. In para 24 of the aforementioned judgment, the Supreme Court only held that in the peculiar facts of that case, belting system for assessing different market price is not appropriate. However, this judgment does not lay down as a ratio decidendi that price of the property should be uniformly assessed in all the cases. In the judgment, belting system has not been rendered insignificant. Hence, this judgment is not applicable to the facts of the present case. In fact, in Bijender and Others v. State of Haryana and Another (Civil Appeal No. 2846 of 2017, decided on 27.10.
2017), the Supreme Court, in para 32 to 36, held that the market value of the front belt abutting the main road should be maximum while dividing the acquired land into three belts in order to ensure that every landowner is paid appropriate amount as per the prevalent market rate. The relevant discussion is extracted as under:- "32) Coming first to the question as to whether the Courts below were justified in applying the "Belting System" for determining the market rates of the acquired land in question? 33) We are of the considered opinion that keeping in view the nature, extent, size, surrounding and location of the acquired land, the Courts below were justified in applying Belting System for determining the market rate of the acquired land.
34) One cannot dispute that the Belting System is a judicially accepted method for determining the fair market value of the
acquired land. It is applied in appropriate cases when different parcels of lands with different survey numbers belonging to different owners and having different locations are acquired which put together comprises of a large chunk of land. Such chunk cannot be taken as a compact block.
35) The acquired land having a frontage abutting the highway/main road always has a better value as compared to the land, which is away from the highway/main road. Indeed, farther the land from the highway/main road, lesser the value of such land. In such a situation, where large pieces of land having different locations are acquired, Belting System is considered apposite for determining the market value of the lands. (see - Union of India & Ors. vs. Mangatu Ram & Ors. 1997 (6) SCC 59 and Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited vs. G. Mohan Reddy & Ors. 2010 (15) SCC 412).
36) In Belting System, the acquired land is usually divided in two or three belts depending upon the facts of each case. The market value of the front belt abutting the main road is taken to fetch maximum value whereas the second belt fetches two third or so of the rate determined in relation to the first belt and the third belt, if considered proper to carve out, fetches half or so of the maximum. It is again depending upon facts of each case." Hence, the RC erred in adversely commenting upon the belting system adopted by the LAC.
5.6 With respect to the remaining acquired land which is located beyond the depth of 2 acres from the Sirsa-Dabwali road (National Highway), the landowners have not produced any sale instance which may prove that the amount offered by the LAC @ ₹40,00,000/- per acre was not adequate. The sale instance No. 5238 (02.03.2010 Ex.R2) is with respect to the plot measuring 5 marlas approximately 150 square yards sold out of rectangle No. 35 khasra No. 19 and 21 whereas the land comprised in rectangle No. 35 khasra Nos. 18 and 23 have been acquired. Hence, it was abutting the acquired land. A bare look at the layout plan also affirms the aforesaid conclusion. This residential plot measuring 150 square yards was sold just two months before the date of notification. The per acre rate of the land comes to ₹29,44,000/-.
Similarly, the sale instance No. 898, dated (Ex.R3) which is also abutting the acquired land has been sold @ ₹40,00,000/- per acre. The sale instances No.2843 and 4143 also prove that the rate of the land was ₹40,00,000/- per acre. Hence, the RC has erred in assessing the market value of the acquired land beyond the depth of 2 acres @ ₹67,42,120/- per acre. Section 25 of the 1894 Act restricts the awarding of the amount lower than the amount assessed by the LAC. Consequently, the market value of ₹40,00,000/- per acre assessed by the LAC for the land located beyond the depth of 2 acres from National Highway is maintained. 5.7 The RC has also committed another illegality while relying upon the judgment (Ex.PX) which was passed with respect to the acquisition made in 1997. In The General Manager, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited v.
acquired land by assuming consistent increase @ 12% per annum continuously for a period of more than 4/5 years. 6.
Decision 6.1 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and discussion, all the appeals are disposed of and the market value of the acquired land is assessed as under:- S.No.
Particulars of the land Amount assessed per acre (In ₹) 1.
Landowners upto the depth of 2 acres from Sirsa-Dabwali Road 2,87,12,333/- 2.
Land beyond the depth of 2 acres from Sirsa-Dabwali Road 40,00,000/- 6.2 The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, in all the appeals, shall stand disposed of.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge April 07, 2025 "DK"
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name 1.
RFA-1000-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Satpal Singh 2.
RFA-1001-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Balwant Singh Alias Banta Singh and Another 3.
RFA-1002-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Jagseer Singh 4.
RFA-1003-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Baljinder Singh and Others 5.
RFA-1009-2023 Vidhya Devi (Now Deceased) Through Lr Vs. State of Haryana and Others 6.
RFA-11-2020 Amit Kumar and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 7.
RFA-1114-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Rajinder Kaur and Other 8.
RFA-1115-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Sukhdev Singh and Others 9.
RFA-1116-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector and Another Vs. Sardool Singh and Others
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name 10.
RFA-1117-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Bhim Sain and Another 11.
RFA-1118-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Leela Devi and Others 12.
RFA-1119-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Harcharan Singh and Others.
13.
RFA-1120-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Harbans Kaur and Others 14.
RFA-1121-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Khalsa High School Education Society and Others 15.
RFA-1122-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector Vs. Sham Lal and Another 16.
RFA-1123-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Pardeep Kumar and Another 17.
RFA-1124-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Ashok Kumar and Others 18.
RFA-1125-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Leela Krishan and Other 19.
RFA-1126-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Mani Ram and Others 20.
RFA-1127-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Harinder Pal Kaur and Others 21.
RFA-1128-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Harpreet Kaur and Others 22.
RFA-1129-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Kashmiri Lal and Others 23.
RFA-1130-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Shashi Bala and Others 24.
RFA-1131-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Gurjeet Kaur and Others 25.
RFA-12-2020 Ranvir Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 26.
RFA-1218-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Madan Lal and Others 27.
RFA-1225-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Parveen Rani and Others 28.
RFA-1226-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Narender Kumar and Others 29.
RFA-1219-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sukhbir Kaur and Others 30.
RFA-1220-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa, District Sirsa Vs. Tusha Rani and Another 31.
RFA-1221-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Pardeep Kumar and Others 32.
RFA-1222-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Manju Walia and Others 33.
RFA-1223-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa, District Sirsa Vs. Pushpa Devi and Another 34.
RFA-1224-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Hardeep Kaur and Others 35.
RFA-13736-2018 Khalsa High School Education Society Dabwali Vs. State
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name of Haryana and Others.
36.
RFA-1435-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Bishamber Dayal and Others 37.
RFA-1436-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jagdish Rai and Others 38.
RFA-1437-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Parveen Rani and Others 39.
RFA-1438-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sunita Rani and Others 40.
RFA-1439-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Manju and Others 41.
RFA-1440-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Charanjit Singh and Others 42.
RFA-1441-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Ashok Kumar and Others 43.
RFA-1442-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jarnail Kaur and Others 44.
RFA-1443-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Raj Rani and Others 45.
RFA-1444-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Tajinder Singh and Others 46.
RFA-1445-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Karam Pal and Others 47.
RFA-1446-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Deep Chand and Others 48.
RFA-1447-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Banta Singh and Others 49.
RFA-1448-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector and Another Vs. Parvesh Rani and Another 50.
RFA-1449-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Shakuntla Rani @ Renu Bala and Others 51.
RFA-1450-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Pushpa Rani and Others 52.
RFA-1451-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Krishan Kumar and Others 53.
RFA-1452-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Jagdish Chand and Others 54.
RFA-1453-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Gurdeep Singh and Others 55.
RFA-1454-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Baldev Singh and Others 56.
RFA-1455-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Santosh 57.
RFA-1456-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sukhwinder Kaur and Others 58.
RFA-1457-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Vijay Pal and Others 59.
RFA-1458-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Gurjant Singh and Others 60.
RFA-1459-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Tara Singh
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name and Others 61.
RFA-1460-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Rajinder Singh and Another 62.
RFA-1461-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Baljinder Singh and Others 63.
RFA-1462-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Dara Singh and Another 64.
RFA-1463-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jagroop Singh and Others 65.
RFA-1464-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Bhagwant Singh and Others 66.
RFA-1465-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Kanta Devi and Others 67.
RFA-1466-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Ashok Kumar and Others 68.
RFA-1467-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Others Vs. Sukhraj Kaur and Another 69.
RFA-1468-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sonika Rani and Others 70.
RFA-1469-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Paras Ram and Another 71.
RFA-1470-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sunita and Others 72.
RFA-1471-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa and Another Vs. Manjit Kaur and Another 73.
RFA-1472-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Arjan Dass and Others 74.
RFA-1473-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sukhbir Singh and Others 75.
RFA-16-2020 Deepak Bansal Vs. State of Haryana and Another 76.
RFA-1607-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Manjit Kaur and Another 77.
RFA-1608-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jagseer Singh and Other 78.
RFA-1857-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Harbans Kaur and Others 79.
RFA-2068-2019 Satpal Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 80.
RFA-2069-2019 Narender Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 81.
RFA-2070-2019 Narender Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 82.
RFA-2071-2019 Tejinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 83.
RFA-277-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Parwati Devi and Others 84.
RFA-278-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Janak Raj @ Raj Singh and Others 85.
RFA-279-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sarwan Singh and Others 86.
RFA-280-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Rajbir Kaur and Others
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name 87.
RFA-281-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Randhir Singh and Others 88.
RFA-282-2019 State of Haryana Through Secretary, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Haryana, Chandigarh Vs. Tejinder Singh and Others 89.
RFA-283-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sukbhir Singh and Others 90.
RFA-284-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Pritam Kumar and Others 91.
RFA-285-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Darshan Singh and Others 92.
RFA-286-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Narender Singh and Others 93.
RFA-3432-2018 Jagseer Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 94.
RFA-3433-2018 Balwant Singh @ Banta Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 95.
RFA-3434-2018 Jagseer Singh @ Jagsir Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 96.
RFA-3872-2018 Sarwan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 97.
RFA-3873-2018 Jagdish Chand and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
98.
RFA-3874-2018 Baljant Singh @ Baljit Singh @ Balwant Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
99.
RFA-3875-2018 Sardool Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
100.
RFA-3876-2018 Smt. Santosh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 101.
RFA-3877-2018 Sukhdev Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 102.
RFA-3878-2018 Karam Pal Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
103.
RFA-3879-2018 Nachhatar Kaur Vs. State of Haryana and Others 104.
RFA-3880-2018 Shakuntla Rani @ Renu Bala and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 105.
RFA-3881-2018 Jagdish Chand Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 106.
RFA-3882-2018 Sukhwinder Kaur and Another. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
107.
RFA-3883-2018 Darshan Singh and Another. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
108.
RFA-3884-2018 Bhagwant Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
109.
RFA-3885-2018 Kashmiri Lal Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 110.
RFA-3886-2018 Leela Krishan Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 111.
RFA-3888-2018 Sukhbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 112.
RFA-3889-2018 Janak Raj @ Raj Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 113.
RFA-3889-2019 Ranvir Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 114.
RFA-3890-2018 Naredner Kumar and Another. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
115.
RFA-3891-2018 Harbans Kaur Deceased Thr Lrs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name 116.
RFA-3894-2018 Harbans Kaur and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 117.
RFA-3895-2018 Arjan Dass Vs. State of Haryana and Others 118.
RFA-3896-2018 Rajinder Kaur Vs. State of Haryana and Others 119.
RFA-3897-2018 Baldev Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
120.
RFA-3898-2018 Sukhdev Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
121.
RFA-3899-2018 Tara Singh Thr Lrs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 122.
RFA-3900-2018 Banta Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 123.
RFA-3901-2018 Baljinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others. 124.
RFA-3902-2018 Sadhu Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
125.
RFA-3903-2018 Jagtar Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
126.
RFA-3904-2018 Sukhbir Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 127.
RFA-3905-2018 Harcharan Singh and Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Others.
128.
RFA-3906-2018 Balkaran Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 129.
RFA-4044-2018 Tusha Rani Vs. State of Haryana & Another 130.
RFA-4045-2018 Pushpa Devi Vs. State of Haryana and Another 131.
RFA-4046-2018 Girdhari Lal Vs. State of Haryana & Another 132.
RFA-4047-2018 Pardeep Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Another 133.
RFA-41-2020 Shashi Bala Vs. State of Haryana and Another 134.
RFA-4519-2018 Rajesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Others 135.
RFA-4520-2018 Sunita Rani Vs. State of Haryana and Others 136.
RFA-4521-2018 Virender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Others 137.
RFA-4522-2018 Pardeep Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Others 138.
RFA-4523-2018 Manju Vs. State of Haryana and Others 139.
RFA-4524-2018 Bishamber Dayal Vs. State of Haryana and Others 140.
RFA-4808-2018 Sidharath Vs. State of Haryana and Others 141.
RFA-5168-2018 Charanjit Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 142.
RFA-5169-2018 Sukhbir Kaur Vs. State of Haryana and Others 143.
RFA-5204-2018 Sham Lal Vs. State of Haryana and Others 144.
RFA-522-2019 Deep Chand and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 145.
RFA-535-2019 Manjit Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 146.
RFA-702-2019 State of Haryana,Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sunita Rani and Others 147.
RFA-703-2019 State of Haryana Vs. Surejit Singh and Others 148.
RFA-704-2019 State of Haryana Through Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate Vs. Rajesh Kumar and Others 149.
RFA-705-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sidharath
Sr. No.
Case No.
Party's Name and Others 150.
RFA-706-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Virender Kumar and Others 151.
RFA-707-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Veena Rani and Others 152.
RFA-708-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Muskan and Others 153.
RFA-709-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Baljant Singh @ Baljit Singh @ Balwant Singh and Others 154.
RFA-710-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jagdish Chand and Others 155.
RFA-711-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Nachhatar Kaur and Others 156.
RFA-712-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sadhu Singh and Others 157.
RFA-713-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Narender Singh and Another 158.
RFA-747-2019 State of Haryana, Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Manjit Singh and Others 159.
RFA-748-2019 State of Haryana, Through Its Collector, Sirsa Vs. Mahinder Singh and Others 160.
RFA-749-2019 State of Haryana and Others Vs. Deepak Bansal and Others 161.
RFA-750-2019 State of Haryana and Others Vs. Ranvir Singh and Others 162.
RFA-751-2019 State of Haryana and Others Vs. Ranvir Singh and Others 163.
RFA-752-2019 State of Haryana and Others Vs. Amit Kumar and Others 164.
RFA-994-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Balkaran Singh and Others 165.
RFA-995-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Sukhdev Singh and Others 166.
RFA-996-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Jagtar Singh and Others 167.
RFA-997-2019 State of Haryana Through Collector, Sirsa Vs. Girdhari Lal and Another 168.
RFA-998-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Sukhdev Singh and Others 169.
RFA-999-2019 State of Haryana and Another Vs. Ashwani Kumar and Another (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge April 07, 2025 "DK"