Sunita Kaur v. Ranjeet Singh






IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.111 TA-1141-2024 Date of Decision: 03.03.2025

   ....Applicant

Versus

 

 .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Sukhbir Maandi, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

             

  ! !"#    
  

         $%    

$ #    &'%  #&( 

  '     ' 

)   
 


$*     !

! !+#  '   $  

# *  ,*  %#   '  $  #  

    

-     



It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 18.07.2023, but no child was born from the said wedlock. However, due to the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is residing at her parental Sonu 2025.03.03 14:46 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC

 


 place in Tarn Taran. She has no source of earning and is totally dependent upon her parental family. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which is pending in the Courts at Tarn Taran, at appearance stage. In the given circumstances, it is difficult for her to commute a distance of about 106 kilometres, to defend the divorce petition. In view of the submissions aforesaid and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, while considering the fact about the respondent not having come forward to contest the application, the transfer application is allowed and                           

  ! !"#    
  

         $%    

$ #    ' &'%  #&(# 

   ' 

)   
 



.  

 $

$% &'%  #&(#        /#
 


-      /#
 
 #

     &'%  #
 


,* #     $ &'%  #
 
 #     '

' %



(ARCHANA PURI) 03.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.03 14:46 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC