Anamika Ray v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M No.46384 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.46384 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.02.2025 Anamika Ray ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Mr. Vaibhav Sood, Advocate for Ms. Anmol Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Mehul Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (in short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashing of FIR No.7 dated 13.01.2024 registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Cyber Crime NIIT, District Faridabad, and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise dated 12.07.2024.

2.

The following order was passed on 27.01.2025:- "XX XX XX XX Status report by way of affidavit of Monica, Assistant Commissioner of Police, NIT, Faridabad has been filed, which is taken on record.

Service is complete.

Adjourned to 28.02.2025.

MOHD YAKUB 2025.03.01 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

CRM-M No.46384 of 2024 In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 28.02.2025.

A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance." 3.

In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone.

4.

In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.7 dated 13.01.2024 registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Cyber Crime NIIT, District Faridabad, and all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioner. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 28.02.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.03.01 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh