Raj Kumar @ Raju v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46187-2024 Date of Decision : September 17, 2024 RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB -RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., the petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.123 dated 14.11.2023, under Sections 323, 324 of the IPC (offence under Section 307, 148, 149 of the IPC added subsequently), registered at P.S. Division No.5, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar.

2.

After addressing arguments for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, however, with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court concerned and to make an application for bail before the latter, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 3.

Leave granted.

4.

Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to, within 10 days from today, surrender before the learned trial Court concerned, and DEVINDER YADAV 2024.09.18 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-46187-2024 thereupon, if he makes an application before the latter for grant of bail, the latter shall decide the same within two days, but, after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the opposite party. (KULDEEP TIWARI) September 17, 2024 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2024.09.18 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment