High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/8509/2025disposed of

Renuka And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

2025-08-06Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal2 pages

CRWP-8509-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8509-2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 RENUKA AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Present:

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG Punjab.

***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 8 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fazilka and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) 2.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. 3.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

MOHIT 2025.08.06 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8509-2025 -24.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fazilka is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 06.08.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.08.06 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document