Ram Diyal v. State Of Punjab
!"#"$%&%'(
* %+ , "!%!%'"- ."-&/& 0! !"/'1 2 "&3'#"'! (4 50 0
0 78- ,9 ! "#$ % &' '( ') ('(*+, - ('(.% + ('+-(&/(& % - 0!1
(
! 2 3
4!$4 4!$4 $4 !+ -
#3$4 $4 !35! ! 7 3 $4 !'8 3*'
4 "#$ 33 7"#$ 44 9
0 :
0 !
23 44 :
0 !
(;
('(;
1
0 !3!0$
8* .( ('(; 43 !0 (& '8 ('(8 2
0 !3!
!
*
< 4!$4 ! !0 (;
('(8 0$
*)&8 ('(8 2 4 4 ! 2 4 4(=!3
,43 ! 2 4 4
;
3
44 ! 2 4! 8' 3 446 ! *&% 2 4 (
4!$4 ! 2 !
!0 45
! 8' 3 ! !0 (;
('(8 9 4 4 7 ( 3 ,4 0 ! ! 3 3 (!'& 4'&! ( ('() 9 4 96 ! 8' 3 44
!2>
4 0
!
0 !33 !2>
40 # 2>
40 , 3
! "
# " "" $ % " !
&' ############# (
)
* % " ########### ( $ + ,(( ' - .$ -
/0(!
1 2
% 3 " "
$ " " " 4 !
5 " %
&
9!3 !
!
0
?
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC 695 has held as under:
not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice." .
9 2@
4 0 '* ('(;: ."#/, * 2%0; %<;=&0! !" ; - &;!- 7 -%*%' , 33" ,
>3 44! ! 0
#
90 3 444! 4 3 4 ! 0 45 ! 3 / ! 0 /
! % , 4
8 0 9
21 A 5/ B/% A B/%