Amanpreet Singh Randhawa v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-46665-2024 and other connected matters

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 22.09.2025 1.

CRM-M-46665-2024 AMANPREET SINGH RANDHAWA .... PETITIONER(S) Vs.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 2.

CRM-M-37698-2025 SOMVIR-1 .... PETITIONER(S) Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 3.

CRM-M-37958-2025 SOMVIR .... PETITIONER(S) Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG Haryana.

Ms. Simran Kaur Bhatti, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.4 in CRM-M-46665-2024.

Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate and Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 in CRM-M-37698-2025 and CRM-M-37958-2025.

**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that directions be issued to the Respondent-Bank(s) not to dispossess them of the vehicles KUSUM 2025.09.24 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

CRM-M-46665-2024 and other connected matters except in accordance with due process of law. The counsels for the respondent-Bank(s) at the very outset undertakes that they would not dispossess the petitioner(s) of the vehicles except in accordance with due process of law. In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2025.09.24 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh