Raj Kumar @ Raj Lahori v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-43930 of 2019 (O&M) .....

Date of decision:28.11.2019 Raj Kumar alias Raj Loharia .....Petitioner v.

State of Punjab .....Respondent ....

Present:

Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.P.S. Gill, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

.....

Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral):

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Surinderjit Singh, who is present in Court to assist him, submits that pursuant to the order of this Court dated October 30, 2019, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required presently. That being so, this petition is allowed, with the order dated October 30, 2019 granting interim bail to the petitioner made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

However, the aforesaid order will not be treated to be an HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.12.02 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-43930 of 2019 (O&M) [2] observation of this Court on the merits of the case, but only in view of the fact that the investigating agency itself has stated that it does not require custodial interrogation of the petitioner.

November 28, 2019.

(Amol Rattan Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.12.02 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh