Sumit And ORS v. Sohan Lal And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.5190 of 2015 Date of Decision.02.08.2016 Sumit in fact Samit and another .......Appellants Vs.

Sohan Lal and another ........Respondents

Present:

None for the appellants.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) There is no representation for the appellants even at the second calling. There had been no representation even at the previous hearing. The second appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 02, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking No Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.03 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document