State Of Haryana Through Collector, Mohindergarh & ORS v. Smt. Sheo Bai




         
 
               

!
      

"#$%"&%  
       '("&!() * "

+,##


  


  























 

 


 



















 

 +  -. # /

.0/

.

  


  


 
!
  


 



!
  


"
  


#


$   
"


#


% 
!


#


&%
'

  


#


  ( 
!


#


  


#


 



#



 


  




)))))



.0/

.1#




$$2%


     The prayer in this application is to condone the delay of 332 days in filing the cross-objections.

Admittedly, the connected appeals arising from the same notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, are pending. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Imrat Lal and others vs. Land Acquisition Collector and others (SC) 2015(2) RCR (Civil) 437, Dhiraj Singh (deceased) thr. LRs vs. Haryana State and others, 2015(2) RCR (Civil) 507 and Jethu Ram (deceased) thr. LRs vs. Union of India and others, 2016(4) Law Herald 3166, has held that in such cases the delay be condoned subject to the denial of interest to the appellants for the period of delay.

SACHIN MEHTA 2022.11.17 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&H High Court, Chandigarh.

 



   

      Hence, the application is allowed and delay of 332 days in filing the cross-objections is condoned, subject to the condition that the cross-objector/landowner shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay.


 *(+   *
  

 

 




 

  

   






 

! 
  
 


 '
# 
# 



 




  ,##      
.0/

.



         


+  
  ,( '-


.


+  
 -



/

SACHIN MEHTA 2022.11.17 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&H High Court, Chandigarh.