Rajiv And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 4002 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.09.2022.

Rajiv and another ....Appellants

VERSUS

The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL.

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.N. Vaid, Advocate, Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Neeraj, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav, Advocate and Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate, Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Nayandeep Rana, Advocate, Mr. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate Mr. M.K. Taya, Advocate Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubber, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate, Ms. Monika Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate, Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate, M. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the landowners.

Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for HSIIDC.

KUMUD VERMA 2022.11.10 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

RFA No. 4002 of 2018 (O&M) -2Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate, Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate, Mr. Dhruv Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.

******* ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No. 9248 of 2018 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 1345 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main case For orders see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No. 10339 of 2014 (O&M) titled as Sat Parkash and others Vs State of Haryana and others.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

30.09.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) kv JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No KUMUD VERMA 2022.11.10 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh