Raj Kumari v. State Of Haryana & ANR

RFA No.5 of 2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RFA No.5 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:31.01.2020 Raj Kumari ....Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Khan Chouhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Laura, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Rathee, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Soni, Advocate, Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate, Mr. SPS Ahulawalia, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate, Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, Mr. P.C. Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Gobind Rana, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, Mr. Gobind Dhanda, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for the landowners.

Ms. Aruna Sachdeva, appellant in person in RFA-3490-2014. Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Additional AG, Haryana, Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.

***** G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.

The appeal is allowed in terms of detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.1253 of 2014 titled as "Ranbir Singh and others Vs. State PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.02.04 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc

RFA No.5 of 2017 (O&M) of Haryana and others".

However, in view of earlier order dated 08.05.2017, the appellant(s) shall not be entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay of 1006 days.

(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 31.01.2020 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.02.04 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc