Sumeri And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-43110-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43110-2025 Decided on: January 22, 2026 Sumeri and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Present:

Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate, and Ms. Apurva Walia, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

-.- SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1.

Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.), seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No.

Date Section(s) Police Station District 11.07.2025 191(3), 190, 115, 118(1), 140(3), 281, and 324(4) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act Sadar, Nuh Nuh 2.

Notice of motion in this petition was issued by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 09.08.2025, but as per PRASHANT KAPOOR 2026.01.23 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement

CRM-M-43110-2025 office note dated 18.08.2025, notices could not be issued to respondent Nos. 2 to 5 for want of process fee.

3.

Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition by stating that the petitioners, namely, (1) Sumeri, (2) Arif Khan, (3) Waseem Akram, (4) Aasif and (5) Nafees, and private respondent Nos. 4 and 5, i.e. Abdul Hafix and Mehboob respectively, have already resolved the dispute amicably and entered into a compromise.

4.

Accordingly, present petition is permitted to be withdrawn, on the basis of aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, and disposed of as such.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE January 22, 2026 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES/NO Whether Reportable:

YES/NO PRASHANT KAPOOR 2026.01.23 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement