Neeraj Bansal v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-25751-2022 Date of Decision:28.08.2024 NEERAJ BANSAL ..Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present:- Mrs. Neeraj Chandel, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through VC) Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana None for respondents No. 2 and 3.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of direction to the respondents to construct a new separate lane for the local vehicles which fall under the radius of 20 KM of the Toll Plaza, Ghamroj, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurugram.

2.

Written statement on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3 has already been filed.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer that if respondent No.3 may be directed to decide the application for granting exemption from payment of toll tax for the local vehicles within the notified area of the Toll Plaza.

4.

There is no representation on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3 today, however, taking into consideration that the petitioner has confined his prayer only to the above extent. This Court deems it appropriate to allow the same.

DINESH KUMAR 2024.09.03 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side

CWP-25751-2022 -24.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation, moved on behalf of the petitioner, within a period of four months. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ) JUDGE 28.08.2024 dinesh 1.Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes 2.Whether reportable?

Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2024.09.03 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side