Renu Rani v. Gulshan Alias Gulshan Kumar

TA-1015-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.239 TA-1015-2025 Date of Decision: 31.10.2025 RENU RANI ....Applicant

Versus

GULSHAN ALIAS GULSHAN KUMAR .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) As per the observations made in the order dated 09.10.2025, despite service, the respondent did not make appearance on that date. Even today, he has not made appearance. As such, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte.

Counsel for the applicant heard.

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/85/2025, titled 'Gulshan Vs. Renu Rani', filed by the respondenthusband, pending in the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Fazilka. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 18.02.2022, but no child was born from the said wedlock. However, on account of the matrimonial dispute, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is not having any Sonu 2025.10.31 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

TA-1015-2025 source of earning and as such, is dependent upon her parental family. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which is pending in the Courts at Fazilka. The respondent has not made appearance in the said petition, despite service and summon has been re-issued. Also, the applicant has filed a complaint, which pending before SSP, Fazilka. The distance between the two places is stated to be about 350 kms.

Considering the aforesaid mitigating circumstances, more particularly, the distance between the two places and also considering the fact about the applicant having no source of earning and above it, considering the fact about the respondent having not come forward to resist the application, the transfer application is allowed and the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/85/2025, titled 'Gulshan Vs. Renu Rani', filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Fazilka. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to the District and Sessions Judge, Fazilka. Learned District and Sessions Judge, Fazilka, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court, Fazilka. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Fazilka, within a period of one month from today onwards.

(ARCHANA PURI) 31.10.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.10.31 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document