← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/51405/2023disposed of

Sadhu Ram Saini v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-10-10Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:131522 CRM-M-51405-2023 Date of decision: October 10th, 2023 Sadhu Ram Saini .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Amarjit Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to take action on complaints dated 16.06.2022 (Annexures P-18 to P25) and register an FIR against respondents No.5 to 8.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that despite repeated representations having been made to the official respondents regarding the harassment which is being meted out to the petitioner by the private respondents, the authorities concerned have been sitting over the matter and have failed to initiate any action against the accused. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if the official respondents are directed to look into the representation dated 16.06.2022 (Annexure P-18) and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

3.

Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4.

On asking of the Court, Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.10.10 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-M-51405-2023 -25.

In the wake of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of and respondent No.3Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra, is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate steps, if any required, at the earliest, under the provisions of law. However, if respondent No.3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation dated 16.06.2022 (Annexure P-18), then the petitioner shall be duly informed as per the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 2013 (4) RCR (Criminal) 979.

October 10th, 2023 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.10.10 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh