← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/43914/2025disposed of

Dhiraj Goyal v. State Of Haryana And Others

2025-09-17Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal2 pages

CRM-M-43914-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43914-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 DHIRAJ GOYAL ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Munish Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5 through video conferencing.

***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1.

This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.87 dated 13.06.2018 registered under Sections 279, 337, 427 IPC(Section 338 IPC added later on) at Police Station Nathu Sarai Chopta, Sirsa, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of panchayati compromise dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2.

This Court vide order dated 12.08.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sirsa and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 29.08.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. MOHIT 2025.09.19 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-43914-2025 (O&M) -24.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.87 dated 13.06.2018 registered under Sections 279, 337, 427 IPC(Section 338 IPC added later on) at Police Station Nathu Sarai Chopta, Sirsa, (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner. 7.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 17.09.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.09.19 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document