Vikram Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M-47962-2024 (O&M) -1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-47962-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2024 Vikram Singh .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, A.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. **** NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is for quashing of FIR No. 0134 dated 07-11-2021, under sections 354-A, 376(2) (n), 376(2)(1) 376(3) 506 IPC and 6 and 8 of POCSO Act 2012 registered at Women Police Station Hisar District Hisar (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising there from on the basis of the compromise dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure P-2), and affidavit dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure P-3).

Learned counsel for the State very vehemently objects to this petition and submits that the complainant in the present case is victim herself. The present matter was investigated by the Inspector General of Police, Hisar District, Hisar and the report dated 14.02.2022 has been prepared. The said report has been handed over in Court today and the same is taken on record. In the said report, it is noted that as per the DIVYANSHI 2024.09.26 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-47962-2024 (O&M) -2 - MLR and statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it appears that allegations made against the petitioner are true. It is further pointed out that Compromise dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure P-2) has been arrived at between the mother of the victim/respondent No.2 herein and the petitioner. Furthermore, the 13year-old victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., as also in her testimony as PW3 has supported the prosecution case and has stood by the gruesome allegations made by her in the FIR. In view of the above, after arguing the matter for some time, when this Court is not inclined to grant the prayer made as very serious allegations have been made against the petitioner that he has repeatedly raped his 13-year-old minor daughter; learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Permitted to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 25.09.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No DIVYANSHI 2024.09.26 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document