Anjali v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRWP No. 9207 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 9207 of 2024 Date of Decision: 23.09.2024 Anjali ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Rahi Mehra, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate direcƟons to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the peƟƟoner, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under ArƟcle 226 of ConsƟtuƟon of India. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the peƟƟoner would be contended and saƟsfied if she is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon before the Senior Superintendent of Police within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner.

3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representaƟon, if any filed within a period of three months. 5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, she is permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon before respondent No.2 within 15 days menƟoning her e-mail ID as well as of her counsel and the Senior Superintendent of Police is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by delegaƟng the same to any officer not Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRWP No. 9207 of 2024 below the rank of PPS, within a period of one month by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoner as well as her counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representaƟon. 6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is allowed with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh