Sahib Singh v. State Of Punjab
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 1
!
"#$
! %% &'
%% !'
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI, JUDGE
!! " !
# $%&'%&%($%)%%&%( *
+
!
%$ &, %&%(%& &, %&%(
* * -
! % . +/ # $%&' %&%( *
%$ &, %&%( 0
# )12,3$% &, %&%( 45 # 12 $$ &) %&%(
,+0
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 2
$''1
( 1)67
$,&'
$( $8 $' 9"
: ;
$,82 : !
;
$%&+0 5 .
6+/ ! " . +/ # $%)% %&%( *
%& &, %&%( 0
# )('$ 45 # 1, $$ &) %&%(
,+0 67
$''1
( 1 ) 67
$,&'
$( $8 $' 9"
: ;
$,82 : !
;
$%&+0 5 .
6+/ ! ( 0 * !
+ ; 5* 45 # 12 $$ &) %&%( " <"
* 5= 5= &'
&) %&%(8 $) "
"
"
< !
*
!
&'
&) %&%( &&
<
" "<=
5="
"
""
< ""
< "* ="
!
!
* !
<" !
> <
,+0
$''1"!
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 3 ; ! "
!
4
>*:4>;
#
"
:;!
:;<
:; " * :; "
! ? 7!*4> # . "
< 0 5 4>
$, &) %&%(
* 45 # 12
*
:
; / 45# 12 " &'
&) %&%( <
< 0"
< " 5< 5 4
! ! "
"!
"
!
" "
< * 5@<!
6/ ! /# $8 &2 &) %&%( "
* /# $8"
<
!
!*5= :; ?$$ &) %&%( " . "
"
6+/ ! $% (&
! "
< !/ !
!
. / A
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 4 .
! B B- CD 0 0< D ! !< E < /
! !
!
!
!
* *
B B
. ! !
!
"
+ +
* *
! ! ! * !!
!
* !
=<! !" ! * * * !* !
* *
! !
5 * ! "
* !
! : 45# 123%&%(
* " !
* /! E = / ''
!" "
" ! *
! * ! B *
!
+
B B "
!
"
* 45 # 1, $$ &) %&%(
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 5
,+0 67
$''1
( 1 ) 67
$,&'
$( $8 $' 9"
: ;
$,82 : !
;
$%&+0 5 .
"
6+/ !
; <
"
"
" < "
* . "
!
*
B
B !< << "
! *5 * .
0"
45# 1, $$ &) %&%(
B B !
. .
!$$ &) %&%(" +
! " # $ $ % & &
' (
)$ # (* + , +- .
$ !+ // +- 0- $ 1 // +- 23 & 45 !"
# $ $ % % 3 % 9 :
3 !" # $ $ %
'
557 . 0 %.$ : ( $ ! + //
+- 0- $ // +- 3 +
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 6
% 0 68 5658 $ 0- 9- 0
468 5658 9- 0
$ 0- $ 0-
3 & 3 .
56 666&; 9 .
<7&<79 4 6= , 0 2 9 4 67 5658
$ 1 0- 9- 0
3 .
56 666&; $ 0- .
<7&<7 $ 0- 3 0 2 $ 9
3 9 4 6> 5658 <<?<7 #+ 5 0 9
# 0
. .4 . 46@ 5658 % 9 $ &% 9
3& % 9&0+ %% %.$
.
'
557 %.$ ) A & $ &"
, 46/ >?66+ #
# , <6
.
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 7 4 <6;67 5658 <6?66 #+ <6&<< 5658 <5?<7 0 3 &
3 3 5 %%
9 >/= 9 % 9 $ &% 9
56;57 3& % 9& 0 + 93
? % 9 C D ; ? !
B E B
"! 45
" 45 # 1, $$ &) %&%($'
&) %&%( 45# 12 &'
&) %&%( %% &) %&%( ; / 45 # 1, $$ &) %&%(
!
$$ &) %&%( "
+ E4 65 5658 $ !+ & .& // +-.
0- & $ & // +-.
: C !C & F .& : 9 , , # + & " .& G # $ $ % $ 9 % 3 H 3 9 3 H 5 766
.
56 3 47 $ !+ & .& // +- 0- 9- 0 C
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 8 C & F .& + & " .& 9
3 5 766 3 .
56 9 C 3 $ 0- 3
: E ;
!
$( &) %&%(
+
< *
"! *
%')!%(& !
* $'&>A
! <* ! *
! " "
"
<
!
! ; ? $2 &) %&%(
"
"45# 12
!
!
!! !
45# 12
* ! ; 5 !
!
+
B B
!
" +
! ! %& &&&3+
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 9 > -
! !
# )12,3$% &, %&%(
+
%$ &, %&%(
+
* ! ! ! < < ! !
! !
B B
!
" *
" ) !*
# )('$3&8 &, %&%( 45 # 1, $$ &) %&%( " ! * -
! %& &, %&%( * !
+
* ! ! ! < < ! !
! !
B B
!
>
+
! 45 *
!!
" +
= < !
*!
<"
!
< ! " 7 +( # ! "
!
+
! A
4>
!
" !
,+0 67
$''1
4>
# . "
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 10
4> !7 !
! .
!! * < * A !
A
1) 9"
: ;
$,82
<
. *
<
12 9
*
+
*
#
+
9
<
+
* 5
!
* !
.
.!
# ,'%&%$ !"##"$%&'()&)%*+ & (,- !%+.#$%)).% 5 !
+
" * ! !
! ?
* ! *
+
+
! +
+
! ! " "
4 * <
*
+
" ! * * !*!
* * = !
* * !
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 11 '
+
! *
* ! <
! < . *
.
9"
: ;
$,82
<
+
, Embargo for release of regular bail is created under Section 43(d)(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. This Section reads as under:- '
(
( G G
# # ? # ( <@8 ( 10.
The proviso to Section 43(5)(d) of UAP Act clearly states that if Courts are satisfied that the prima-facie allegations against the accuse are true after "perusal of case diary or report made under section 173 Cr.P.C." bail cannot be granted. In other words, after examining documents annexed to report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. if the Courts are satisfied that allegations against the accused are not true, bail under Section 43D(5) of UAP Act can be granted.
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 12 11.
Hon'ble Apex Court in case Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2024) 5 SCC 403, elaborately dealt with what amounts to a prima-facie case. Paragraphs 24 to 35 of the aforesaid judgment are relevant which are reproduced herein for ready reference:- 9 ;
=8I (#( =8;$J7* #
( G(G #
; J7* =8;$ ; J7* ( # # ; J7* =8;$
(
!" # $ % & % '&
& &
( )
( *+#+
% % %
& & '
%
, *+# +
&& %
- *+#+
12.
Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb, (2021) 3 SCC 713 held that Section 43D(5) per se does not oust the jurisdiction of the constitutional Courts to grant bail on violation of Part III of the Constitution of India, but it further states that they have to be construed harmoniously. It has been observed as under: - !"
=8;$J7*
# #
( %
. %
/
%
0 :
3
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 13
3 =8;$J7* # D ! "!!
#$ 13.
In Vernon v. State of Maharashtra, (2023) 15 SCC 56, Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under: - !
: <I>@ <8 </>6 ( 9 - K 3 9
'-)
'- J565<*8 ((@<8A 0 ) 0 + J565<* 8 (( @58A 3
'-)
'- J565<*8 ((@<8A =8;$J7*
1
'- )
'- 2 ! "!3 % ,
&
/
&
&' %
% +
!
% ,
&
%& '4 % , % ' ' - L
:)'
L
: J56<I* 7 (( < ? J56<I* 5 (( J(* 8/8A - F 9 '
)F 9 '
J5667*5 ((<8? 5667 ((J(*=/<A
( F - ) F - <I>6 (( 4" ( 5 ? . <I>5 ( 578A % J$ *)% J$ * J<I@/*< ((<</?<I@/ ((J(* =<A
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 14 1 1 - F3 K <= 5< ( : ( GG <I>@ 9 -
</>6( <I>@ DJ *
14.
The observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Harpreet Singh Talwar @ Kabir Talwar vs. State of Gujarat through National Investigating Agency, 2025 SCC On Line SC 1103, are also relevant on the point regarding release of accused on bail in UAP Act. In paragraph-24, it has been observed as under:-
9
=8$J7* #
5< ( 0 3 D $)
!+ " !
! 3
* 5 *
A !
+
! !
* * 4>
$&
"
4>" + # #, #( J*+ J* J*
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 15 #$ #2 : # # #% ( #0 # #F "H ?
!
" 4>
+ <* '( ( '( 3 3 # # 5* '
3 ,% 8* B $ =* : $ # ( 7* + 0 >* "H F 0
3 D 4>
*
!
F !
!
! < !< ! " "
!* ! !
* $8
*
* < * "
! "
*
* +
" ++
! *
CRA D Nos. 1208-2023 and 1252-2023 16 !!
! " !
=!
G -
/
!
. # 2'1% &1 &2 %&%( * /
0 5 .
1) 9
" !
*
* " ! " A
$2
+
A 45 # 23%&$$ $%23%&$$ $1'3%&$, 67
=<! ! 45# %$'3%&%% 123%&%(1,3%&%(
=<! !
+
45 # ,13%&%(
$'
5 "
* ! !
A * +
*
! !
*
( GURVINDER SINGH GILL ) (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE JUDGE 26.11.2025 ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No